Breakdown of predictability in gravitational collapse

S. W. Hawking
Phys. Rev. D 14, 2460 – Published 15 November 1976
An article within the collection: 2015 - General Relativity’s Centennial and the The Work of Stephen Hawking in Physical Review
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

The principle of equivalence, which says that gravity couples to the energy-momentum tensor of matter, and the quantum-mechanical requirement that energy should be positive imply that gravity is always attractive. This leads to singularities in any reasonable theory of gravitation. A singularity is a place where the classical concepts of space and time break down as do all the known laws of physics because they are all formulated on a classical space-time background. In this paper it is claimed that this breakdown is not merely a result of our ignorance of the correct theory but that it represents a fundamental limitation to our ability to predict the future, a limitation that is analogous but additional to the limitation imposed by the normal quantum-mechanical uncertainty principle. The new limitation arises because general relativity allows the causal structure of space-time to be very different from that of Minkowski space. The interaction region can be bounded not only by an initial surface on which data are given and a final surface on which measurements are made but also a "hidden surface" about which the observer has only limited information such as the mass, angular momentum, and charge. Concerning this hidden surface one has a "principle of ignorance": The surface emits with equal probability all configurations of particles compatible with the observers limited knowledge. It is shown that the ignorance principle holds for the quantum-mechanical evaporation of black holes: The black hole creates particles in pairs, with one particle always falling into the hole and the other possibly escaping to infinity. Because part of the information about the state of the system is lost down the hole, the final situation is represented by a density matrix rather than a pure quantum state. This means there is no S matrix for the process of black-hole formation and evaporation. Instead one has to introduce a new operator, called the superscattering operator, which maps density matrices describing the initial situation to density matrices describing the final situation.

  • Received 25 August 1975

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevD.14.2460

©1976 American Physical Society

Collections

This article appears in the following collections:

2015 - General Relativity’s Centennial

The editors of the Physical Review journals have curated a collection of landmark papers on General Relativity to celebrate its centennial.

The Work of Stephen Hawking in Physical Review

To mark the passing of Stephen Hawking, we gathered together his 55 papers in Physical Review D and Physical Review Letters. They probe the edges of space and time, from "Black holes and thermodynamics” to "Wave function of the Universe."

Authors & Affiliations

S. W. Hawking*

  • Department of Applied Mathematics and Theoretical Physics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, England and California Institute of Technology, Pasadena, California 91125

  • *Sherman Fairchild Distinguished Scholar at the California Institute of Technology.

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 14, Iss. 10 — 15 November 1976

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review D

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×