• Open Access

Higher order and anisotropic hydrodynamics for Bjorken and Gubser flows

Chandrodoy Chattopadhyay, Ulrich Heinz, Subrata Pal, and Gojko Vujanovic
Phys. Rev. C 97, 064909 – Published 14 June 2018

Abstract

We study the evolution of hydrodynamic and nonhydrodynamic moments of the distribution function using anisotropic and third-order Chapman-Enskog hydrodynamics for systems undergoing Bjorken and Gubser flows. The hydrodynamic results are compared with the exact solution of the Boltzmann equation with a collision term in relaxation time approximation. While the evolution of the hydrodynamic moments of the distribution function (i.e., of the energy momentum tensor) can be described with high accuracy by both hydrodynamic approximation schemes, their description of the evolution of the entropy of the system is much less precise. We attribute this to large contributions from nonhydrodynamic modes coupling into the entropy evolution, which are not well captured by the hydrodynamic approximations. The differences between the exact solution and the hydrodynamic approximations are larger for the third-order Chapman-Enskog hydrodynamics than for anisotropic hydrodynamics, which effectively resums some of the dissipative effects from anisotropic expansion to all orders in the anisotropy, and are larger for Gubser flow than for Bjorken flow. Overall, anisotropic hydrodynamics provides the most precise macroscopic description for these highly anisotropically expanding systems.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 1 February 2018
  • Corrected 15 October 2018

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.97.064909

Published by the American Physical Society under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. Further distribution of this work must maintain attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI.

Published by the American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Corrections

15 October 2018

Correction: Minor typographical errors in the first inline equations that appear after Eqs. (26) and (53) and in Eqs. (46), (55), and (57) have been corrected.

Authors & Affiliations

Chandrodoy Chattopadhyay1, Ulrich Heinz2,3, Subrata Pal1, and Gojko Vujanovic2

  • 1Department of Nuclear and Atomic Physics, Tata Institute of Fundamental Research, Homi Bhabha Road, Mumbai 400005, India
  • 2Department of Physics, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, USA
  • 3Theoretical Physics Department, CERN, CH-1211 Genève 23, Switzerland

Article Text

Click to Expand

References

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 97, Iss. 6 — June 2018

Reuse & Permissions
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Reuse & Permissions

It is not necessary to obtain permission to reuse this article or its components as it is available under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International license. This license permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided attribution to the author(s) and the published article's title, journal citation, and DOI are maintained. Please note that some figures may have been included with permission from other third parties. It is your responsibility to obtain the proper permission from the rights holder directly for these figures.

×

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×