Low-energy nuclear reaction of the N14+Tm169 system: Incomplete fusion

R. Kumar, Vijay R. Sharma, Abhishek Yadav, Pushpendra P. Singh, Avinash Agarwal, S. Appannababu, S. Mukherjee, B. P. Singh, R. Ali, and R. K. Bhowmik
Phys. Rev. C 96, 054614 – Published 30 November 2017

Abstract

Excitation functions of reaction residues produced in the N14+Tm169 system have been measured to high precision at energies above the fusion barrier, ranging from 1.04VB to 1.30VB, and analyzed in the framework of the statistical model code pace4. Analysis of α-emitting channels points toward the onset of incomplete fusion even at slightly above-barrier energies where complete fusion is supposed to be one of the dominant processes. The onset and strength of incomplete fusion have been deduced and studied in terms of various entrance channel parameters. Present results together with the reanalysis of existing data for various projectile-target combinations conclusively suggest strong influence of projectile structure on the onset of incomplete fusion. Also, a strong dependence on the Coulomb effect (ZPZT) has been observed for the present system along with different projectile-target combinations available in the literature. It is concluded that the fraction of incomplete fusion linearly increases with ZPZT and is found to be more for larger ZPZT values, indicating significantly important linear systematics.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
2 More
  • Received 19 May 2017
  • Revised 16 August 2017

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.054614

©2017 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

R. Kumar1, Vijay R. Sharma1,*, Abhishek Yadav1, Pushpendra P. Singh2, Avinash Agarwal3, S. Appannababu4, S. Mukherjee5, B. P. Singh6, R. Ali7, and R. K. Bhowmik1

  • 1Nuclear Physics Group, Inter-University Accelerator Center, New Delhi 110 067, India
  • 2Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Ropar, Rupnagar, Punjab 140 001, India
  • 3Physics Department, Bareilly College, Bareilly 243 005, India
  • 4Departamento de Fisica Nuclear, Instituto de Fisica, Universidade de Sao Paulo, CEP 05508 090, Brazil
  • 5Physics Department, Maharaja Sayajirao University of Baroda, Vadodara 390 002, India
  • 6Accelerator Laboratory, Department of Physics, A. M. University, Aligarh 202 002, India
  • 7Department of Physics, Gandhi Faiz-E-Aam (Post Graduate) College, Shahjahanpur 242 001, India

  • *Corresponding author: phy.vijayraj@gmail.com

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 96, Iss. 5 — November 2017

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×