Systematic study of low-energy incomplete fusion: Role of entrance channel parameters

Abhishek Yadav, Pushpendra P. Singh, Mohd. Shuaib, Vijay R. Sharma, Indu Bala, Unnati, Sunita Gupta, D. P. Singh, M. K. Sharma, R. Kumar, S. Murlithar, R. P. Singh, B. P. Singh, and R. Prasad
Phys. Rev. C 96, 044614 – Published 18 October 2017

Abstract

An attempt has been made to investigate the role of various entrance channel parameters in low-energy (47 MeV/nucleon) incomplete fusion reactions through excitation function measurements. The analysis of measured excitation functions, in the framework of statistical model code pace4, reveals that the xn/pxn channels are populated, predominantly, via complete fusion processes. However, in the production of α-emitting channels, even after correcting for the precursor decay contribution, a significant enhancement as compared to statistical model predictions has been observed, which may be attributed due to the contribution of breakup processes. The observed enhancement is found to increase with projectile energy. Further, the comparison of present work with literature data reveals the dependence of incomplete fusion on mass-asymmetry of interacting partners, αQ value of the projectile, and also on ZPZT (the Coulomb factor). From the present analysis, it may be concluded that a single entrance channel parameter (i.e., mass asymmetry or ZPZT or αQ value) is not able to explain, completely, the yields of the low-energy incomplete fusion component. Therefore, a combination of these parameters and/or a parameter which can incorporate all gross features of interacting partners should be chosen to get a systematics for such reactions.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 15 July 2017

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.044614

©2017 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Abhishek Yadav1,*, Pushpendra P. Singh2, Mohd. Shuaib3, Vijay R. Sharma1, Indu Bala1, Unnati4, Sunita Gupta5, D. P. Singh6, M. K. Sharma7, R. Kumar1, S. Murlithar1, R. P. Singh1, B. P. Singh3, and R. Prasad3

  • 1Nuclear Physics Group, Inter-University Accelerator Centre, New Delhi 110 067, Delhi, India
  • 2Physics Department, Indian Institute of Technology Ropar, Roopnagar 140 001, Panjab, India
  • 3Physics Department, Aligarh Muslim University, Aligarh 202 002, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • 4Department of Physics & Astrophysics, Delhi University, New Delhi 110 007, Delhi, India
  • 5Physics Department, Agra College, Agra 282 001, Uttar Pradesh, India
  • 6Department of Physics, University of Petroleum and Energy Studies, Dehradun 248 007, Uttarakhand, India
  • 7Physics Department, S. V. College, Aligarh 202 001, Uttar Pradesh, India

  • *abhishekyadav117@gmail.com

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 96, Iss. 4 — October 2017

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×