Mass distribution and mass-resolved angular distribution in the O16+U238 reaction at sub-barrier energy

T. N. Nag, R. Tripathi, S. Sodaye, K. Sudarshan, K. Ramachandran, B. K. Nayak, and P. K. Pujari
Phys. Rev. C 96, 044608 – Published 11 October 2017

Abstract

Background: The angular distribution of fission fragments or products is a sensitive probe to investigate non-compound-nucleus (NCN) fission. However, the gross angular distribution cannot distinguish between different NCN fission processes. Both preequilibrium fission and quasifission contribute to NCN fission and would both result in deviations from the statistical saddle point model (SSPM). Mass-resolved angular distributions of the fission product offers the possibility to distinguish between the two mechanisms [Sodaye et al., Phys. Rev. C 95, 014612 (2017); Tripathi et al., Phys. Rev. C 88, 024603 (2013); Vorkapic and Ivanisevic, Phys. Rev. C 55, 2711 (1997)].

Purpose: Mass and mass-resolved angular distributions of fission products have been measured in the O16+U238 reaction at Elab=85.3MeV to investigate the dominant NCN fission mechanism at sub-barrier energy.

Method: Mass and mass-resolved angular distributions were measured by recoil catcher technique followed by offline γ-ray spectrometry.

Results: The mass distribution was observed to be predominantly asymmetric. The angular anisotropy of the fission products was observed to be independent of their mass.

Conclusions: The mass independence of the angular anisotropy suggested quasifission to be the dominant NCN fission process. This was further confirmed from the underestimation of angular anisotropy by theoretical calculations even after including the contribution from preequilibrium fission.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 8 May 2017
  • Revised 1 August 2017

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.96.044608

©2017 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

T. N. Nag1, R. Tripathi1,*, S. Sodaye1, K. Sudarshan1, K. Ramachandran2, B. K. Nayak2, and P. K. Pujari1

  • 1Radiochemistry Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400085, India
  • 2Nuclear Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400085, India

  • *Corresponding author: rahult@barc.gov.in

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 96, Iss. 4 — October 2017

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×