Magnetic moment and lifetime measurements of Coulomb-excited states in Cd106

N. Benczer-Koller, G. J. Kumbartzki, K.-H. Speidel, D. A. Torres, S. J. Q. Robinson, Y. Y. Sharon, J. M. Allmond, P. Fallon, I. Abramovic, L. A. Bernstein, J. E. Bevins, H. L. Crawford, Z. E. Guevara, A. M. Hurst, L. Kirsch, T. A. Laplace, A. Lo, E. F. Matthews, I. Mayers, L. W. Phair, F. Ramirez, and A. Wiens
Phys. Rev. C 94, 034303 – Published 6 September 2016

Abstract

Background: The Cd isotopes are well studied, but experimental data for the rare isotopes are sparse. At energies above the Coulomb barrier, higher states become accessible.

Purpose: Remeasure and supplement existing lifetimes and magnetic moments of low-lying states in Cd106.

Methods: In an inverse kinematics reaction, a Cd106 beam impinging on a C12 target was used to Coulomb excite the projectiles. The high recoil velocities provide a unique opportunity to measure g factors with the transient-field technique and to determine lifetimes from lineshapes by using the Doppler-shift-attenuation method. Large-scale shell-model calculations were carried out for Cd106.

Results: The g factors of the 21+ and 41+ states in Cd106 were measured to be g(21+)=+0.398(22) and g(41+)=+0.23(5). A lineshape analysis yielded lifetimes in disagreement with published values. The new results are τ(Cd106;21+)=7.0(3)ps and τ(Cd106;41+)=2.5(2)ps. The mean life τ(Cd106;22+)=0.28(2)ps was determined from the fully-Doppler-shifted γ line. Mean lives of τ(Cd106;43+)=1.1(1)ps and τ(Cd106;31)=0.16(1)ps were determined for the first time.

Conclusions: The newly measured g(41+) of Cd106 is found to be only 59% of the g(21+). This difference cannot be explained by either shell-model or collective-model calculations.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 1 August 2016

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.94.034303

©2016 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

N. Benczer-Koller1,*, G. J. Kumbartzki1, K.-H. Speidel2, D. A. Torres3, S. J. Q. Robinson4, Y. Y. Sharon1, J. M. Allmond5, P. Fallon6, I. Abramovic7, L. A. Bernstein6,7,8, J. E. Bevins7, H. L. Crawford6, Z. E. Guevara3, A. M. Hurst6,7, L. Kirsch7, T. A. Laplace7,8, A. Lo7, E. F. Matthews7, I. Mayers7, L. W. Phair6, F. Ramirez3, and A. Wiens6

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, Rutgers University, New Brunswick, New Jersey 08903, USA
  • 2Helmholtz-Institut für Strahlen- und Kernphysik, Universität Bonn, D-53115 Bonn, Germany
  • 3Departamento de Física, Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Carrera 30 No 45-03, Bogotá D.C., Colombia
  • 4Physics Department, Millsaps College, Jackson, Mississippi 39210, USA
  • 5Physics Division, Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37831, USA
  • 6Nuclear Science Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 7Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 8Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94551, USA

  • *nkoller@physics.rutgers.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 94, Iss. 3 — September 2016

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×