• Editors' Suggestion

Complete identification of states in Pb208 below Ex=6.2 MeV

A. Heusler, R. V. Jolos, T. Faestermann, R. Hertenberger, H.-F. Wirth, and P. von Brentano
Phys. Rev. C 93, 054321 – Published 23 May 2016

Abstract

The Q3D magnetic spectrograph at the Maier-Leibnitz-Laboratorium of the Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München and the Technische Universität München (Garching, Germany), was used to study the Pb208(p,p), Pb206,207,208(d,p), and Pb208(d,d) reactions. One hundred fifty-one states at Ex<6.20MeV in Pb208 are identified and spin and parity assigned. Four states are newly identified and new spins and/or parities are assigned to 25 states. Tentative spin assignments are done to five states at 5.90<Ex<6.10MeV. Nearly 50 levels below Ex=6.20MeV listed by the Nuclear Data Sheets as of 2007 are recognized to be nonexistent or doubly placed. The schematic shell model describing one-particle–one-hole configurations without residual interaction is extended by including two-particle–two-hole configurations. The number of configurations thus predicted at Ex<6.20MeV nearly agrees with the number of states identified. Several states with dominant two-particle–two-hole configurations are identified. New isobaric analog resonances in Bi209 with two-particle–one-hole structure are discovered at Eres=17.6MeV. The excitation energies of 70 states with unnatural parity at Ex<6.20MeV are found to agree within about 200 keV with one-particle–one-hole configurations predicted by the extended schematic shell model. In contrast, the excitation energies of about 20 natural parity states are more than 0.5 MeV lower than predicted, demonstrating the residual interaction among the configurations to be much larger for natural parity than for unnatural parity.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
18 More
  • Received 4 December 2015

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.93.054321

©2016 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

A. Heusler*

  • Gustav-Kirchhoff-Strasse 7/1, D-69120 Heidelberg, Germany

R. V. Jolos

  • Bogoliubov Laboratory of Theoretical Physics, JINR, Dubna State University, 141980 Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia and Dubna State University, 141980 Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia

T. Faestermann

  • Lehrstuhl für Physik der Hadronen und Kerne (E12), Technische Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany

R. Hertenberger

  • Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany

H.-F. Wirth

  • Lehrstuhl für Physik der Hadronen und Kerne (E12), Technische Universität München and Fakultät für Physik, Ludwig-Maximilians-Universität München, D-85748 Garching, Germany

P. von Brentano

  • Institut für Kernphysik, Universität zu Köln, D-50937 Köln, Germany

  • *a.heusler@mpi-hd.mpg.de

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 93, Iss. 5 — May 2016

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×