Abstract
Background: A signature of many dynamical models of dark energy is that they admit variation in the fine structure constant over cosmological time scales.
Purpose: We reconsider the analysis of the sensitivity of neutron resonance energies to changes in with a view to resolving uncertainties that plague earlier treatments.
Methods: We point out that with more appropriate choices of nuclear parameters, the standard estimate (from Damour and Dyson) of the sensitivity for resonances in is increased by a factor of 2.5. We go on to identify and compute excitation, Coulomb, and deformation corrections. To this end, we use deformed Fermi density distributions fitted to the output of Hartree-Fock (HF) + BCS calculations (with both the SLy4 and Skyrme functionals), the energetics of the surface diffuseness of nuclei, and thermal properties of their deformation. We also invoke the eigenstate thermalization hypothesis, performing the requisite microcanonical averages with two phenomenological level densities which, via the leptodermous expansion of the level density parameter, include the effect of increased surface diffuseness. Theoretical uncertainties are assessed with the inter-model prescription of Dobaczewski et al. [J. Phys. G: Nucl. Part. Phys. 41, 074001 (2014)].
Results: The corrections diminish the revised sensitivity but not by more than 25%. Subject to a weak and testable restriction on the change in (relative to the change in since the time when the Oklo reactors were active is the average of the and current quark masses, and is the mass scale of quantum chromodynamics), we deduce that (95% confidence level). The corresponding bound on the present-day time variation of is tighter than the best limit to date from atomic clock experiments.
Conclusions: The order of magnitude of our Oklo bound on changes in is reliable. It is one order of magnitude lower than the Oklo-based bound most commonly adopted in earlier attempts to identify phenomenologically successful models of variation.
- Received 23 March 2015
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.92.014319
©2015 American Physical Society