Barrier distributions and signatures of transfer channels in the Ca40+Ni58,64 fusion reactions at energies around and below the Coulomb barrier

D. Bourgin, S. Courtin, F. Haas, A. M. Stefanini, G. Montagnoli, A. Goasduff, D. Montanari, L. Corradi, E. Fioretto, J. Huiming, F. Scarlassara, N. Rowley, S. Szilner, and T. Mijatović
Phys. Rev. C 90, 044610 – Published 21 October 2014

Abstract

Background: The nuclear structure of colliding nuclei is known to influence the fusion process. Couplings of the relative motion to nuclear shape deformations and vibrations lead to an enhancement of the sub-barrier fusion cross section in comparison with the predictions of one-dimensional barrier penetration models. This enhancement is explained by coupled-channels calculations including these couplings. The sub-barrier fusion cross section is also affected by nucleon transfer channels between the colliding nuclei.

Purpose: The aim of the present experiment is to investigate the influence of the projectile and target nuclear structures on the fusion cross sections in the Ca40+Ni58 and Ca40+Ni64 systems.

Methods: The experimental and theoretical fusion excitation functions as well as the barrier distributions were compared for these two systems. Coupled-channels calculations were performed using the ccfull code.

Results: Good agreement was found between the measured and calculated fusion cross sections for the Ca40+Ni58 system. The situation is different for the Ca40+Ni64 system where the coupled-channels calculations with no nucleon transfer clearly underestimate the fusion cross sections below the Coulomb barrier. The fusion excitation function was, however, well reproduced at low and high energies by including the coupling to the neutron pair-transfer channel in the calculations.

Conclusions: The nuclear structure of the colliding nuclei influences the fusion cross sections below the Coulomb barrier for both Ca40+Ni58,64 systems. Moreover, we highlighted the effect of the neutron pair-transfer channel on the fusion cross sections in Ca40+Ni64.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 4 September 2014

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.90.044610

©2014 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

D. Bourgin1,2,*, S. Courtin1,2, F. Haas1,2, A. M. Stefanini3, G. Montagnoli4, A. Goasduff5, D. Montanari1,2,6, L. Corradi3, E. Fioretto3, J. Huiming3, F. Scarlassara4, N. Rowley7, S. Szilner8, and T. Mijatović8

  • 1IPHC, Université de Strasbourg, F-67037 Strasbourg, France
  • 2CNRS, UMR7178, F-67037 Strasbourg, France
  • 3INFN, Laboratori Nazionali di Legnaro, I-35020 Legnaro (Padova), Italy
  • 4Dipartimento di Fisica, Università di Padova, and INFN, Sezione di Padova, I-35131 Padova, Italy
  • 5CSNSM UMR8609 IN2P3-CNRS, Université Paris-Sud 11, F-91404 Orsay, France
  • 6Institut d'Etudes Avancées de l'Université de Strasbourg, Strasbourg, France
  • 7Institut de Physique Nucléaire, Orsay, France
  • 8Ruder Boskovic Institute, HR-10002 Zagreb, Croatia

  • *dominique.bourgin@iphc.cnrs.fr

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 90, Iss. 4 — October 2014

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×