Spurious finite-size instabilities in nuclear energy density functionals

V. Hellemans, A. Pastore, T. Duguet, K. Bennaceur, D. Davesne, J. Meyer, M. Bender, and P.-H. Heenen
Phys. Rev. C 88, 064323 – Published 23 December 2013

Abstract

Background: It is known that some well established parametrizations of the nuclear energy density functional (EDF) do not always lead to converged results for nuclei. Earlier studies point towards the existence of a qualitative link between this finding and the appearance of finite-size instabilities of symmetric nuclear matter (SNM) near saturation density when computed within the random phase approximation (RPA).

Purpose: We aim to establish a stability criterion based on computationally friendly RPA calculations that can be incorporated into fitting procedures of the coupling constants of the EDF. Therefore, a quantitative and systematic connection between the impossibility to converge self-consistent calculations of nuclei and the occurrence of finite-size instabilities in SNM is investigated for the scalar-isovector (S=0, T=1) instability of the standard Skyrme EDF.

Results: Tuning the coupling constant C1ρΔρ of the gradient term that triggers scalar-isovector instabilities of the standard Skyrme EDF, we find that the occurrence of instabilities in finite nuclei depends strongly on the numerical scheme used to solve the self-consistent mean-field equations. Once the critical value of the coupling constant C1ρΔρ is determined in nuclei, one can extract the corresponding lowest density ρcrit at which a pole appears at zero energy in the RPA response function.

Conclusions: Instabilities of finite nuclei can be artificially hidden due to the choice of inappropriate numerical schemes or overly restrictive, e.g., spherical, symmetries. Our analysis suggests a twofold stability criterion to avoid scalar-isovector instabilities.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
4 More
  • Received 30 October 2013
  • Revised 28 November 2013

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.88.064323

©2013 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

V. Hellemans1,*, A. Pastore2,3,4,†, T. Duguet5,6, K. Bennaceur3,4,7, D. Davesne3,4, J. Meyer3,4, M. Bender8,9, and P.-H. Heenen1

  • 1PNTPM, CP229, Université Libre de Bruxelles, B-1050 Bruxelles, Belgium
  • 2IAA, CP226, Université Libre de Bruxelles, B-1050 Bruxelles, Belgium
  • 3Université Lyon 1, 43 Boulevard du 11 Novembre 1918, F-69622 Villeurbanne cedex, France
  • 4CNRS-IN2P3, UMR 5822, Institut de Physique Nucléaire de Lyon, 4 Rue Enrico Fermi, 69622 Villeurbanne Cedex, France
  • 5CEA-Saclay DSM/IRFU/SPhN, F-91191 Gif sur Yvette Cedex, France
  • 6National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
  • 7Department of Physics, P.O. Box 35 (YFL), Fl-40014 University of Jyväskylä, Finland
  • 8Université Bordeaux, Centre d'Etudes Nucléaires de Bordeaux Gradignan, UMR5797, F-33170 Gradignan, France
  • 9CNRS/IN2P3, Centre d'Etudes Nucléaires de Bordeaux Gradignan, UMR5797, F-33170 Gradignan, France

  • *vhellema@ulb.ac.be
  • apastore@ulb.ac.be

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 88, Iss. 6 — December 2013

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×