Abstract
Background: Heavy-flavor production in + collisions is a good test of perturbative-quantum-chromodynamics (pQCD) calculations. Modification of heavy-flavor production in heavy-ion collisions relative to binary-collision scaling from + results, quantified with the nuclear-modification factor (), provides information on both cold- and hot-nuclear-matter effects. Midrapidity heavy-flavor measurements at the Relativistic Heavy Ion Collider have challenged parton-energy-loss models and resulted in upper limits on the viscosity-entropy ratio that are near the quantum lower bound. Such measurements have not been made in the forward-rapidity region.
Purpose: Determine transverse-momentum () spectra and the corresponding for muons from heavy-flavor meson decay in + and Cu Cu collisions at GeV and .
Method: Results are obtained using the semileptonic decay of heavy-flavor mesons into negative muons. The PHENIX muon-arm spectrometers measure the spectra of inclusive muon candidates. Backgrounds, primarily due to light hadrons, are determined with a Monte Carlo calculation using a set of input hadron distributions tuned to match measured-hadron distributions in the same detector and statistically subtracted.
Results: The charm-production cross section in + collisions at GeV, integrated over and in the rapidity range , is found to be mb. This result is consistent with a perturbative fixed-order-plus-next-to-leading-log calculation within scale uncertainties and is also consistent with expectations based on the corresponding midrapidity charm-production cross section measured by PHENIX. The for heavy-flavor muons in Cu Cu collisions is measured in three centrality bins for GeV/. Suppression relative to binary-collision scaling () increases with centrality.
Conclusions: Within experimental and theoretical uncertainties, the measured charm yield in + collisions is consistent with state-of-the-art pQCD calculations. Suppression in central Cu Cu collisions suggests the presence of significant cold-nuclear-matter effects and final-state energy loss.
7 More- Received 3 April 2012
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.86.024909
©2012 American Physical Society