Deuteron-equivalent and phase-equivalent interactions within light nuclei

A. M. Shirokov, V. A. Kulikov, A. I. Mazur, J. P. Vary, and P. Maris
Phys. Rev. C 85, 034004 – Published 26 March 2012

Abstract

Background: Phase-equivalent transformations (PETs) are well known in quantum scattering and inverse-scattering theory. PETs do not affect scattering phase shifts and bound-state energies of a two-body system but are conventionally supposed to modify two-body bound-state observables such as the rms radius and electromagnetic moments.

Purpose: In order to preserve all bound-state observables, we propose a new particular case of PETs, a deuteron-equivalent transformation (DET-PET), which leaves unchanged not only scattering phase shifts and bound-state (deuteron) binding energy but also the bound-state wave function.

Methods: The construction of DET-PET is discussed; equations defining the simplest DET-PETs are derived. We apply these simplest DET-PETs to the JISP16 NN interaction and use the transformed NN interactions in calculations of 3H and 4He binding energies in the no-core full configuration (NCFC) approach based on extrapolations of the no-core shell model (NCSM) basis space results to the infinite basis space.

Results: We demonstrate the DET-PET modification of the np scattering wave functions and study the DET-PET manifestation in the binding energies of 3H and 4He nuclei and their correlation (Tjon line).

Conclusions: It is shown that some DET-PETs generate modifications of the central component while the others modify the tensor component of the NN interaction. DET-PETs are able to modify significantly the np scattering wave functions and hence the off-shell properties of the NN interaction. DET-PETs give rise to significant changes in the binding energies of 3H (in the range of approximately 1.5 MeV) and 4He (in the range of more than 9 MeV) and are able to modify the correlation patterns of binding energies of these nuclei.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 31 December 2011

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.85.034004

©2012 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

A. M. Shirokov

  • Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA and Pacific National University, 136 Tikhookeanskaya Street, Khabarovsk 680035, Russia

V. A. Kulikov

  • Skobeltsyn Institute of Nuclear Physics, Moscow State University, Moscow 119991, Russia, and Pacific National University, 136 Tikhookeanskaya Street, Khabarovsk 680035, Russia

A. I. Mazur

  • Pacific National University, 136 Tikhookeanskaya Street, Khabarovsk 680035, Russia

J. P. Vary

  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA

P. Maris

  • Department of Physics and Astronomy, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa 50011, USA

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 85, Iss. 3 — March 2012

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×