Spontaneous fission properties of Fm258, Md259, Md260, No258, and ]260: Bimodal fission

E. K. Hulet, J. F. Wild, R. J. Dougan, R. W. Lougheed, J. H. Landrum, A. D. Dougan, P. A. Baisden, C. M. Henderson, R. J. Dupzyk, R. L. Hahn, M. Schädel, K. Sümmerer, and G. R. Bethune
Phys. Rev. C 40, 770 – Published 1 August 1989
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

We have measured the mass and kinetic-energy distributions from the spontaneous fission of Fm258, No258, Md259, Md260, and ]260. All are observed to fission with a symmetrical division of mass. The total-kinetic-energy distributions strongly deviated from the Gaussian shape characteristically found in the fission of all other actinides. When the total-kinetic-energy distributions are resolved into two Gaussians, the constituent peaks lie near 200 and 233 MeV. We conclude that both low- and high-energy fission modes occur in four of the five nuclides studied. We call this property ‘‘bimodal fission.’’ Even though both modes are possible in the same nuclide, one generally predominates. We offer an explanation for each mode based on shell structures of the fissioning nucleus and of its fragments. The appearance of both modes of fission in this region of the nuclide chart seems to be a coincidence in that the opportunity to divide into near doubly magic Sn fragments occurs in the same region where the second fission barrier is expected to drop in energy below the ground state of the fissioning nucleus. Appropriate paths on the potential-energy surface of deformation have been found by theorists, but no physical grounds have been advanced that would allow the near equal populations we observe traveling each path. We suggest that this failure to find a reason for somewhat equal branching may be a fundamental flaw of current fission models. Assuming the proposed origins of these modes are correct, we conclude the low-energy, but also mass-symmetrical mode is likely to extend to far heavier nuclei. The high-energy mode will be restricted to a smaller region, a realm of nuclei defined by the proximity of the fragments to the strong neutron and proton shells in Sn132. We present some concluding remarks on the present state of fission theory and indicate a potential redirection that might be taken.

  • Received 28 December 1988

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.40.770

©1989 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

E. K. Hulet, J. F. Wild, R. J. Dougan, R. W. Lougheed, J. H. Landrum, A. D. Dougan, P. A. Baisden, C. M. Henderson, and R. J. Dupzyk

  • University of California, Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory, Livermore, California 94551

R. L. Hahn

  • Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, Tennessee 37830

M. Schädel and K. Sümmerer

  • Gesellschaft für Schwerionenforschung, 6100 Darmstadt, Federal Republic of Germany

G. R. Bethune

  • Bethune-Cookman College, Daytona Beach, Florida 32015

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 40, Iss. 2 — August 1989

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×