Comparing pion production in transport simulations of heavy-ion collisions at 270AMeV under controlled conditions

Jun Xu, Hermann Wolter, Maria Colonna, Mircea Dan Cozma, Pawel Danielewicz, Che Ming Ko, Akira Ono, ManYee Betty Tsang, Ying-Xun Zhang, Hui-Gan Cheng, Natsumi Ikeno, Rohit Kumar, Jun Su, Hua Zheng, Zhen Zhang, Lie-Wen Chen, Zhao-Qing Feng, Christoph Hartnack, Arnaud Le Fèvre, Bao-An Li, Yasushi Nara, Akira Ohnishi, and Feng-Shou Zhang (TMEP Collaboration)
Phys. Rev. C 109, 044609 – Published 5 April 2024

Abstract

Within the Transport Model Evaluation Project (TMEP), we present a detailed study of the performance of different transport models in Sn+Sn collisions at 270AMeV, which are representative reactions used to study the equation of state at suprasaturation densities. We put particular emphasis on the production of pions and Δ resonances, which have been used as probes of the nuclear symmetry energy. In this paper, we aim to understand the differences in the results of different codes for a given physics model to estimate the uncertainties of transport model studies in the intermediate energy range. Thus, we prescribe a common and rather simple physics model, and follow in detail the results of four Boltzmann-Uehling-Uhlenbeck (BUU) models and six quantum molecular dynamics (QMD) models. The nucleonic evolution of the collision and the nucleonic observables in these codes do not completely converge, but the differences among the codes can be understood as being due to several reasons: the basic differences between BUU and QMD models in the representation of the phase-space distributions, computational differences in the mean-field evaluation, and differences in the adopted strategies for the Pauli blocking in the collision integrals. For pionic observables, we find that a higher maximum density leads to an enhanced pion yield and a reduced π/π+ yield ratio, while a more effective Pauli blocking generally leads to a slightly suppressed pion yield and an enhanced π/π+ yield ratio. We specifically investigate the effect of the Coulomb force and find that it increases the total π/π+ yield ratio but reduces the ratio at high pion energies, although differences in its implementations do not have a dominating role in the differences among the codes. Taking into account only the results of codes that strictly follow the homework specifications, we find a convergence of the codes in the final charged-pion yield ratio to a 1σ deviation of about 5%. However, the uncertainty is expected to be reduced to about 1.6% if the same or similar strategies and ingredients, i.e., an improved Pauli blocking and calculation of the nonlinear term in the mean-field potential, are similarly used in all codes. As a result of this work, we identify the sensitive aspects of a simulation with respect to pion observables, and suggest optimal procedures in some cases. This work provides benchmark calculations of heavy-ion collisions to be complemented in the future by simulations with more realistic physics models, which include the momentum-dependence of isoscalar and isovector mean-field potentials and pion in-medium effects.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
10 More
  • Received 7 August 2023
  • Accepted 11 March 2024

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.109.044609

©2024 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Jun Xu1,*, Hermann Wolter2,†, Maria Colonna3,‡, Mircea Dan Cozma4,§, Pawel Danielewicz5,6,∥, Che Ming Ko7,¶, Akira Ono8,#, ManYee Betty Tsang5,6,**, Ying-Xun Zhang9,10,††, Hui-Gan Cheng11, Natsumi Ikeno12,13, Rohit Kumar5, Jun Su14, Hua Zheng15, Zhen Zhang14, Lie-Wen Chen16, Zhao-Qing Feng11, Christoph Hartnack17, Arnaud Le Fèvre18, Bao-An Li19, Yasushi Nara20, Akira Ohnishi21,‡‡, and Feng-Shou Zhang22,23 (TMEP Collaboration)

  • 1School of Physics Science and Engineering, Tongji University, Shanghai 200092, China
  • 2Faculty of Physics, University of Munich, D-85748 Garching, Germany
  • 3INFN-LNS, Laboratori Nazionali del Sud, 95123 Catania, Italy
  • 4IFIN-HH, Reactorului 30, 077125 Măgurele-Bucharest, Romania
  • 5Facility for Rare Isotope Beams, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
  • 6Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
  • 7Cyclotron Institute and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Texas A&M University, College Station, Texas 77843, USA
  • 8Department of Physics, Tohoku University, Sendai 980-8578, Japan
  • 9China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing 102413, China
  • 10Guangxi Key Laboratory Breeding Base of Nuclear Physics and Technology, Guilin 541004, China
  • 11School of Physics and Optoelectronic Technology, South China University of Technology, Guangzhou 510641, China
  • 12Department of Life and Environmental Agricultural Sciences, Tottori University, Tottori 680-8551, Japan
  • 13RIKEN Nishina Center, 2-1 Hirosawa, Wako, Saitama 351-0198, Japan
  • 14Sino-French Institute of Nuclear Engineering & Technology, Sun Yat-sen University, Zhuhai 519082, China
  • 15School of Physics and Information Technology, Shaanxi Normal University, Xi'an 710119, China
  • 16School of Physics and Astronomy, Shanghai Key Laboratory for Particle Physics and Cosmology, and Key Laboratory for Particle Astrophysics and Cosmology (MOE), Shanghai Jiao Tong University, Shanghai 200240, China
  • 17SUBATECH, UMR 6457, IMT Atlantique, IN2P3/CNRS Université de Nantes, 4 rue Alfred Kastler, 44307 Nantes, France
  • 18GSI Helmholtzzentrum für Schwerionenforschung GmbH, D-64291 Darmstadt, Germany
  • 19Department of Physics and Astronomy, Texas A&M University-Commerce, Commerce, Texas 75429-3011, USA
  • 20Akita International University, Akita 010-1292, Japan
  • 21Yukawa Institute for Theoretical Physics, Kyoto University, Kyoto 606-8502, Japan
  • 22Key Laboratory of Beam Technology of Ministry of Education, College of Nuclear Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
  • 23Institute of Radiation Technology, Beijing Academy of Science and Technology, Beijing 100875, China

  • *junxu@tongji.edu.cn
  • hermann.wolter@physik.uni-muenchen.de
  • colonna@lns.infn.it
  • §dan.cozma@theory.nipne.ro
  • danielewicz@frib.msu.edu
  • ko@comp.tamu.edu
  • #ono@nucl.phys.tohoku.ac.jp
  • **tsang@frib.msu.edu
  • ††zhyx@ciae.ac.cn
  • ‡‡Deceased.

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 109, Iss. 4 — April 2024

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article part of CHORUS

Accepted manuscript will be available starting 5 April 2025.
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×