Experimental and theoretical study of the Cu65(n,p)Ni65 reaction cross section from reaction threshold up to 25 MeV

R. K. Singh, N. L. Singh, Mayur Mehta, Rakesh Chauhan, H. Kumawat, Rajnikant Makwana, S. V. Suryanarayana, B. K. Nayak, H. Naik, Jan Varmuza, and K. Katovsky
Phys. Rev. C 107, 054607 – Published 15 May 2023

Abstract

The cross section of the Cu65(n,p)Ni65 reaction was studied experimentally at three different neutron energies using an activation technique. The quasimonoenergetic neutrons were produced via the Li7(p,n) reaction at the 14UD BARC-TIFR Pelletron facility in Mumbai, India. Al monitor foils along with Cu samples were activated to determine the incident neutron flux. The activities of the reaction products were measured using a high resolution high purity germanium spectrometry system. Statistical model calculations were performed using the reaction codes talys (ver. 1.9) and empire (ver. 3.2.3) from the reaction threshold to the neutron energy of 25 MeV. Additionally, the effects of various combinations of the theoretical nuclear level densities (NLDs), optical model potentials (OMPs), preequilibrium models (PEs), and γ-ray strength functions (γ SFs) were considered for the reproduction of experimental data. The input parameters needed in theoretical calculations to reproduce the present and previous measurements were taken from the RIPL-3 database. The present results are compared with the previous measurements, with the latest evaluations of the ENDF/B-VIII.0, JEFF-3.3, JENDL-4.0/HE, CENDL-3.2, TENDL-2019, and FENDL-3.2 libraries, and with the theoretically calculated values based on talys and empire codes. Furthermore, the cross section of the Cu65(n,p)Ni65 reaction was estimated within the neutron energies of 14–15 MeV using different systematic formulas. These estimated cross sections by various systematic formulas were compared with the available experimental data. The present data will help to understand the nuclear reaction theory (models) in higher energy regions and improve the evaluated nuclear data evaluation that is needed for fundamental nuclear applications.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
2 More
  • Received 30 April 2022
  • Accepted 6 April 2023

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.107.054607

©2023 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

R. K. Singh1,*, N. L. Singh1,5,*, Mayur Mehta1,2, Rakesh Chauhan1, H. Kumawat3, Rajnikant Makwana1, S. V. Suryanarayana3, B. K. Nayak3, H. Naik4, Jan Varmuza6, and K. Katovsky6

  • 1Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, The M. S. University of Baroda, Vadodara 390002, India
  • 2Institute for Plasma Research, Gandhinagar, Gujarat 382428, India
  • 3Nuclear Physics Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400085, India
  • 4Radiochemistry Division, Bhabha Atomic Research Centre, Mumbai 400085, India
  • 5Department of Physics, Netaji Subhas University of Technology, Dwarka, Delhi 110078, India
  • 6Department of Electrical Power Engineering, Brno University of Technology, Brno 61600, Czech Republic

  • *ratankumar339@gmail.com; nl.singh-phy@msubaroda.ac.in

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 107, Iss. 5 — May 2023

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×