Astrophysical N15(n,γ)N16 reaction rate from precision measurement of the N15(d,p)N16 angular distributions

X. Y. Li (李鑫悦), B. Guo (郭冰), Z. H. Li (李志宏), Y. J. Li (李云居), J. Su (苏俊), D. Y. Pang (庞丹阳), J. J. He (何建军), S. Q. Yan (颜胜权), Q. W. Fan (樊启文), J. C. Liu (刘建成), L. Gan (甘林), Z. Y. Han (韩治宇), E. T. Li (李二涛), G. Lian (连钢), Y. P. Shen (谌阳平), Y. B. Wang (王友宝), S. Zeng (曾晟), and W. P. Liu (柳卫平)
Phys. Rev. C 106, 025807 – Published 25 August 2022

Abstract

Background: Asymptotic giant branch stars are one of the possible sites of fluorine production as confirmed by astronomical observation. The N15(n,γ)N16 reaction competes with N15(α,γ)F19 on the reaction chain and thus influences the production of the only stable fluorine isotope F19. The N15(n,γ)N16 reaction rate at low temperatures of astrophysical interest depends on the neutron spectroscopic factors of the four low-lying states in N16.

Purpose: The N16 neutron spectroscopic factors from two previous measurements of (d,p) reaction differ by a factor of 2. This work was intended to investigate these spectroscopic factors via a precision measurement of the N15(d,p)N16 angular distributions using a Q3D magnetic spectrograph.

Methods: The high resolution of the Q3D magnetic spectrograph led to clear separation of these four closely spaced states. The neutron spectroscopic factors were extracted from the present angular distributions with the distorted wave Born approximation and adiabatic distorted wave approximation methods.

Results: The neutron spectroscopic factors of the N16 ground, 0.120, 0.298, and 0.397 MeV states were extracted to be 1.32±0.12, 1.33±0.18, 1.10±0.10, and 1.30±0.14, respectively. The new results support the conclusion that these four states in N16 are all good single-particle levels. The cross section and reaction rate of N15(n,γ)N16 were calculated based on the present spectroscopic factors.

Conclusions: The present work provides a precision measurement of the spectroscopic factors of the N16 states and the resulting N15(n,γ)N16 reaction rate. The present higher reaction rate of the N15(n,γ)N16 reaction suggests higher flow through N15(n,γ)N16 compared with previous expectation.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 30 March 2022
  • Revised 8 May 2022
  • Accepted 2 August 2022

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.025807

©2022 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

X. Y. Li (李鑫悦)1,2, B. Guo (郭冰)1,*, Z. H. Li (李志宏)1, Y. J. Li (李云居)1, J. Su (苏俊)2,3, D. Y. Pang (庞丹阳)4, J. J. He (何建军)2,3, S. Q. Yan (颜胜权)1, Q. W. Fan (樊启文)1, J. C. Liu (刘建成)1, L. Gan (甘林)5, Z. Y. Han (韩治宇)1, E. T. Li (李二涛)5, G. Lian (连钢)1, Y. P. Shen (谌阳平)1, Y. B. Wang (王友宝)1, S. Zeng (曾晟)1, and W. P. Liu (柳卫平)1

  • 1China Institute of Atomic Energy, Beijing 102413, China
  • 2College of Nuclear Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China
  • 3Beijing Radiation Center, Beijing 100875, China
  • 4School of Physics and Beijing Key Laboratory of Advanced Nuclear Materials and Physics, Beihang University, Beijing 100191, China
  • 5College of Physics and Optoelectronic Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China

  • *Corresponding author: guobing@ciae.ac.cn

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 106, Iss. 2 — August 2022

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×