Indirect measurement of the (n,γ)Sb127 cross section

F. Pogliano, A. C. Larsen, F. L. Bello Garrote, M. M. Bjørøen, T. K. Eriksen, D. Gjestvang, A. Görgen, M. Guttormsen, K. C. W. Li, M. Markova, E. F. Matthews, W. Paulsen, L. G. Pedersen, S. Siem, T. Storebakken, T. G. Tornyi, and J. E. Vevik
Phys. Rev. C 106, 015804 – Published 25 July 2022

Abstract

Nuclei in the I135 region have been identified as being a possible bottleneck for the i process. Here we present an indirect measurement for the Maxwellian-averaged cross section of Sb126(n,γ). The nuclear level density and the γ-ray strength function of Sb127 have been extracted from Sn124(α,pγ)Sb127 data using the Oslo method. The level density in the low-excitation-energy region agrees well with known discrete levels, and the higher-excitation-energy region follows an exponential curve compatible with the constant-temperature model. The strength function between Eγ1.58.0 MeV presents several features, such as an upbend and a possibly double-peaked pygmy-like structure. None of the theoretical models included in the nuclear reaction code talys seem to reproduce the experimental data. The Maxwellian-averaged cross section for the Sb126(n,γ)Sb127 reaction has been experimentally constrained by using our level-density and strength-function data as input to talys. We observe a good agreement with the jina reaclib, tendl, and bruslib libraries, while the endf/b-viii.0 library predicts a significantly higher rate than our results.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 14 March 2022
  • Accepted 27 June 2022
  • Corrected 25 May 2023

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.106.015804

©2022 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Corrections

25 May 2023

Correction: Typographical errors in Eqs. (2), (3), (19) and in the second sentence of the second paragraph of Sec. II have been fixed.

Authors & Affiliations

F. Pogliano1,*, A. C. Larsen1,†, F. L. Bello Garrote1, M. M. Bjørøen1, T. K. Eriksen1, D. Gjestvang1, A. Görgen1, M. Guttormsen1, K. C. W. Li1, M. Markova1, E. F. Matthews2, W. Paulsen1, L. G. Pedersen1, S. Siem1, T. Storebakken1, T. G. Tornyi1, and J. E. Vevik1

  • 1Department of Physics, University of Oslo, N-0316 Oslo, Norway
  • 2Department of Nuclear Engineering, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA

  • *francesco.pogliano@fys.uio.no
  • a.c.larsen@fys.uio.no

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 106, Iss. 1 — July 2022

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×