Abstract
Background: The reaction rate is one of the largest remaining sources of uncertainty in the final abundances of nuclei created in a classical nova involving a ONe white dwarf. The reaction rate directly influences silicon isotopic ratios, which are used as identifiers of presolar grains with nova origins. In addition, the uncertainty in the reaction rate has been found to limit the use of nova nuclear thermometers based on observations of elemental ratios in nova ejecta.
Purpose: Reduce uncertainties in the nuclear data for proton-unbound states in , which act as resonances for the reaction at classical nova temperatures, and develop a technique for high efficiency, high-resolution reaction-decay coincidence measurements.
Methods: The reaction was used to populate the states of interest in . The experiment was performed at the Texas A&M Cyclotron Institute using the LLNL Hyperion array for the detection of charged particles and rays. A downstream silicon telescope was used to select reaction deuterons, and a single upstream silicon detector was used to measure protons emitted in the decay of unbound levels.
Results: Several states in above the proton separation energy were observed to have been populated. Decay protons from the resonant states in were identified as events in the upstream silicon detectors that came in coincidence with deuterons in the downstream telescope. Protons emitted from these states were measured and branching ratios extracted.
Conclusions: While no new reaction rate is derived, spin-parity assignments for several higher-lying proton unbound states have been confirmed. Measured branching ratios for these levels have been compared to previous measurements with good agreement, and in some cases provided a reduction in uncertainty. The previously identified state may have been incorrectly assigned a large branching ratio in a previous measurement. The technique of measuring reaction-decay coincidences with a particle-gamma setup appears promising.
3 More- Received 22 November 2021
- Revised 18 February 2022
- Accepted 5 April 2022
- Corrected 10 June 2022
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.105.045805
©2022 American Physical Society
Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)
Corrections
10 June 2022
Correction: The author lists of References [17,18] contained errors and have been fixed. A reference and its citation in text were missing (Ref. [25]) and have been inserted, necessitating renumbering of the two subsequent references.