Total absorption spectroscopy of the β decay of Zr101,102 and Tc109

A. C. Dombos, A. Spyrou, F. Naqvi, S. J. Quinn, S. N. Liddick, A. Algora, T. Baumann, J. Brett, B. P. Crider, P. A. DeYoung, T. Ginter, J. Gombas, S. Lyons, T. Marketin, P. Möller, W.-J. Ong, A. Palmisano, J. Pereira, C. J. Prokop, P. Sarriguren, D. P. Scriven, A. Simon, M. K. Smith, and S. Valenta
Phys. Rev. C 103, 025810 – Published 25 February 2021

Abstract

The β decay of Zr101,102 and Tc109 was studied using the technique of total absorption spectroscopy. The experiment was performed at the National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory using the Summing NaI(Tl) (SuN) detector in the first-ever application of total absorption spectroscopy with a fast beam produced via projectile fragmentation. The β-decay feeding intensity and Gamow-Teller transition strength distributions were extracted for these three decays. The extracted distributions were compared to three different quasiparticle random-phase approximation (QRPA) models based on different mean-field potentials. A comparison with calculations from one of the QRPA models was performed to learn about the ground-state shape of the parent nucleus. For Zr101 and Zr102, calculations assuming a pure shape configuration (oblate or prolate) were not able to reproduce the extracted distributions. These results may indicate that some type of mixture between oblate and prolate shapes is necessary to reproduce the extracted distributions. For Tc109, a comparison of the extracted distributions with QRPA calculations suggests a dominant oblate configuration. The other two QRPA models are commonly used to provide β-decay properties in r-process network calculations. This work shows the importance of making comparisons between the experimental and theoretical β-decay distributions, rather than just half-lives and β-delayed neutron emission probabilities, as close to the r-process path as possible.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
2 More
  • Received 3 March 2020
  • Revised 5 February 2021
  • Accepted 15 February 2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.103.025810

©2021 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Authors & Affiliations

A. C. Dombos1,2,3,*, A. Spyrou1,2,3, F. Naqvi1,3, S. J. Quinn1,2,3, S. N. Liddick1,4,3, A. Algora5,6, T. Baumann1, J. Brett7, B. P. Crider1,8, P. A. DeYoung7, T. Ginter1, J. Gombas7, S. Lyons1,3,†, T. Marketin9, P. Möller10,‡, W.-J. Ong1,2,3, A. Palmisano1,2,3, J. Pereira1,3, C. J. Prokop1,4, P. Sarriguren11, D. P. Scriven2, A. Simon12, M. K. Smith1,3, and S. Valenta13

  • 1National Superconducting Cyclotron Laboratory, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
  • 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
  • 3Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
  • 4Department of Chemistry, Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48824, USA
  • 5Instituto de Física Corpuscular, CSIC–Universidad de Valencia, E-46071, Valencia, Spain
  • 6Institute of Nuclear Research of the Hungarian Academy of Sciences, Debrecen H-4026, Hungary
  • 7Department of Physics, Hope College, Holland, Michigan 49422-9000, USA
  • 8Department of Physics and Astronomy, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, Mississippi 39762, USA
  • 9Department of Physics, Faculty of Science, University of Zagreb, 10000 Zagreb, Croatia
  • 10Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
  • 11Instituto Estructura de la Materia, IEM-CSIC, Serrano 123, E-28006 Madrid, Spain
  • 12Department of Physics and Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, USA
  • 13Faculty of Mathematics and Physics, Charles University, 180 00 Prague, Czech Republic

  • *Present address: Department of Physics and Joint Institute for Nuclear Astrophysics, University of Notre Dame, Notre Dame, Indiana 46556, USA; adombos@nd.edu
  • Present address: Pacific Northwest National Laboratory, Richland, Washington 99352, USA.
  • Present address: P. Moller Scientific Computing and Graphics, P. O. Box 75009 Honolulu, Hawaii 96836-0009, USA.

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 103, Iss. 2 — February 2021

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×