Indirect measurement of the 57.7 keV resonance strength for the astrophysical γ-ray source of the Mg25(p,γ)Al26 reaction

Y. J. Li (李云居), Z. H. Li (李志宏), E. T. Li (李二涛), X. Y. Li (李鑫悦), T. L. Ma (马田丽), Y. P. Shen (谌阳平), J. C. Liu (刘建成), L. Gan (甘林), Y. Su (苏毅), L. H. Qiao (乔律华), Z. Y. Han (韩治宇), Y. Zhou (周勇), J. Su (苏俊), S. Q. Yan (颜胜权), S. Zeng (曾晟), Y. B. Wang (王友宝), B. Guo (郭冰), G. Lian (连钢), D. Nan (南丁), X. X. Bai (白希祥), and W. P. Liu (柳卫平)
Phys. Rev. C 102, 025804 – Published 27 August 2020

Abstract

Mg25(p,γ)Al26 is the most important reaction in the Mg-Al cycle in the hydrogen burning regions of stars. Its cross sections at stellar energies are essential to understand the issues of radioactive Al26 in the galaxy and meteorites. The 57.7 keV resonance dominate the Mg25(p,γ)Al26 astrophysical reaction rates at relative low temperature, but it is very difficult to measure its resonance strength directly, and the indirect measurement results deviate by a factor of about 2 by far. In this work, the angular distributions of Mg25(Li7,He6)Al26 leading to 6.364 MeV and eleven low-lying states in Al26 have been measured by the Q3D magnetic spectrometer of the HI-13 tandem accelerator. The spectroscopic factors were derived and used to deduce the proton width and 57.7 keV resonance strength. The astrophysical Mg25(p,γ)Al26 reaction rates at stellar energies have been updated by using the present result.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 29 April 2020
  • Accepted 27 July 2020
  • Corrected 9 September 2020
  • Corrected 11 December 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevC.102.025804

©2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Nuclear Physics

Corrections

9 September 2020

Correction: Reference [30] contained the wrong author and source listing and has been fixed.

11 December 2020

Second Correction: New References [30] and [34] were added and subsequent references have been renumbered.

Authors & Affiliations

Y. J. Li (李云居)1, Z. H. Li (李志宏)1,2,*, E. T. Li (李二涛)3, X. Y. Li (李鑫悦)1, T. L. Ma (马田丽)1, Y. P. Shen (谌阳平)1, J. C. Liu (刘建成)1, L. Gan (甘林)3, Y. Su (苏毅)1, L. H. Qiao (乔律华)1, Z. Y. Han (韩治宇)1, Y. Zhou (周勇)1, J. Su (苏俊)4, S. Q. Yan (颜胜权)1, S. Zeng (曾晟)1, Y. B. Wang (王友宝)1, B. Guo (郭冰)1, G. Lian (连钢)1, D. Nan (南丁)1, X. X. Bai (白希祥)1, and W. P. Liu (柳卫平)1

  • 1China Institute of Atomic Energy, P. O. Box 275(10), Beijing 102413, China
  • 2School of Nuclear Science and Technology, University of Chinese Academy of Science, Beijing 101408, China
  • 3College of Physics and Energy, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen 518060, China
  • 4College of Nuclear Science and Technology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China

  • *zhhli@foxmail.com

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 102, Iss. 2 — August 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review C

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×