Thermodynamic stability and properties of boron subnitrides from first principles

A. Ektarawong, S. I. Simak, and B. Alling
Phys. Rev. B 95, 064206 – Published 24 February 2017

Abstract

We use the first-principles approach to clarify the thermodynamic stability as a function of pressure and temperature of three different α-rhombohedral-boron-like boron subnitrides, with the compositions of B6N, B13N2, and B38N6, proposed in the literature. We find that, out of these subnitrides with the structural units of B12(N-N), B12(NBN), and [B12(NN)]0.33[B12(NBN)]0.67, respectively, only B38N6, represented by [B12(NN)]0.33[B12(NBN)]0.67, is thermodynamically stable. Beyond a pressure of about 7.5 GPa depending on the temperature, also B38N6 becomes unstable, and decomposes into cubic boron nitride and α-tetragonal-boron-like boron subnitride B50N2. The thermodynamic stability of boron subnitrides and relevant competing phases is determined by the Gibbs free energy, in which the contributions from the lattice vibrations and the configurational disorder are obtained within the quasiharmonic and the mean-field approximations, respectively. We calculate lattice parameters, elastic constants, phonon and electronic density of states, and demonstrate that [B12(NN)]0.33[B12(NBN)]0.67 is both mechanically and dynamically stable, and is an electrical semiconductor. The simulated x-ray powder-diffraction pattern as well as the calculated lattice parameters of [B12(NN)]0.33[B12(NBN)]0.67 are found to be in good agreement with those of the experimentally synthesized boron subnitrides reported in the literature, verifying that B38N6 is the stable composition of α-rhombohedral-boron-like boron subnitride.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 19 December 2016

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.95.064206

©2017 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

A. Ektarawong1,*, S. I. Simak2, and B. Alling1,3

  • 1Thin Film Physics Division, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology (IFM), Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden
  • 2Theoretical Physics Division, Department of Physics, Chemistry and Biology (IFM), Linköping University, SE-581 83 Linköping, Sweden
  • 3Max-Planck-Institut für Eisenforschung GmbH, D-40237 Düsseldorf, Germany

  • *anekt@ifm.liu.se

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 95, Iss. 6 — 1 February 2017

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×