Surface phase, morphology, and charge distribution transitions on vacuum and ambient annealed SrTiO3(100)

Omur E. Dagdeviren, Georg H. Simon, Ke Zou, Fred J. Walker, Charles Ahn, Eric I. Altman, and Udo D. Schwarz
Phys. Rev. B 93, 195303 – Published 4 May 2016

Abstract

The surface structures of SrTiO3 (100) single crystals were examined as a function of annealing time and temperature in either oxygen atmosphere or ultrahigh vacuum (UHV) using noncontact atomic force microscopy (NC-AFM), Auger electron spectroscopy (AES), and low-energy electron diffraction (LEED). Samples were subsequently analyzed for the effect the modulation of their charge distribution had on their surface potential. It was found that the evolution of the SrTiO3 surface roughness, stoichiometry, and reconstruction depends on the preparation scheme. LEED revealed phase transitions from a (1×1) termination to an intermediate c(4×2) reconstruction to ultimately a (13×13)R33.7 surface phase when the surface was annealed in an oxygen flux, while the reverse transition from (13×13)R33.7 to c(4×2) was observed when samples were annealed in UHV. When the surface reverted to c(4×2), AES data indicated decreases in both the surface Ti and O concentrations. These findings were corroborated by NC-AFM imaging, where initially TiO2-terminated crystals developed half-unit cell high steps following UHV annealing, which is typically attributed to a mix of SrO and TiO2 terminations. Surface roughness evolved nonmonotonically with UHV annealing temperature, which is explained by electrostatic modulations of the surface potential caused by increasing oxygen depletion. This was further corroborated by experiments in which the apparent roughness tracked in NC-AFM could be correlated with changes in the surface charge distribution that were controlled by applying a bias voltage to the sample. Based on these findings, it is suggested that careful selection of preparation procedures combined with application of an electric field may be used to tune the properties of thin films grown on SrTiO3.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 4 December 2015
  • Revised 20 February 2016

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.93.195303

©2016 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Omur E. Dagdeviren1,2, Georg H. Simon1,2, Ke Zou2,3, Fred J. Walker2,3, Charles Ahn1,2,3, Eric I. Altman2,4, and Udo D. Schwarz1,2,4,*

  • 1Department of Mechanical Engineering and Materials Science, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
  • 2Center for Research on Interface Structures and Phenomena (CRISP), Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
  • 3Department of Applied Physics, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA
  • 4Department of Chemical and Environmental Engineering, Yale University, New Haven, Connecticut 06520, USA

  • *Corresponding author: udo.schwarz@yale.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 93, Iss. 19 — 15 May 2016

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×