Impact of alloy disorder on the band structure of compressively strained GaBixAs1x

Muhammad Usman, Christopher A. Broderick, Zahida Batool, Konstanze Hild, Thomas J. C. Hosea, Stephen J. Sweeney, and Eoin P. O’Reilly
Phys. Rev. B 87, 115104 – Published 5 March 2013

Abstract

The incorporation of bismuth (Bi) in GaAs results in a large reduction of the band gap energy (Eg) accompanied with a large increase in the spin-orbit splitting energy (SO), leading to the condition that SO>Eg, which is anticipated to reduce hot-hole producing Auger recombination losses whereby the energy and momentum of a recombining electron-hole pair are given to a second hole which is excited into the spin-orbit band. We theoretically investigate the electronic structure of experimentally grown GaBixAs1x samples on (100) GaAs substrates by directly comparing our data with room temperature photomodulated reflectance (PR) measurements. Our atomistic theoretical calculations, in agreement with the PR measurements, confirm that Eg is equal to SO for x 9%. We then theoretically probe the inhomogeneous broadening of the interband transition energies as a function of the alloy disorder. The broadening associated with spin-split-off transitions arises from conventional alloy effects, while the behavior of the heavy-hole transitions can be well described using a valence band-anticrossing model. We show that for the samples containing 8.5% and 10.4% Bi the difficulty in identifying a clear light-hole-related transition energy from the measured PR data is due to the significant broadening of the host matrix light-hole states as a result of the presence of a large number of Bi resonant states in the same energy range and disorder in the alloy. We further provide quantitative estimates of the impact of supercell size and the assumed random distribution of Bi atoms on the interband transition energies in GaBixAs1x. Our calculations support a type-I band alignment at the GaBixAs1x/GaAs interface, consistent with recent experimental findings.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 14 February 2013

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.87.115104

©2013 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Muhammad Usman1,*, Christopher A. Broderick1,2, Zahida Batool3, Konstanze Hild3, Thomas J. C. Hosea3,4, Stephen J. Sweeney3, and Eoin P. O’Reilly1,2

  • 1Tyndall National Institute, Lee Maltings, Dyke Parade, Cork, Ireland
  • 2Department of Physics, University College Cork, Cork, Ireland
  • 3Advanced Technology Institute and Department of Physics, University of Surrey, Guildford, Surrey GU2 7XH, United Kingdom
  • 4Ibnu Sina Institute for Fundamental Science Studies, Universiti Teknologi Malaysia, Johor Bahru, Johor 81310, Malaysia

  • *usman@alumni.purdue.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 87, Iss. 11 — 15 March 2013

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×