• Editors' Suggestion

Breakdown of Fermi liquid behavior at the (π,π)=2kF spin-density wave quantum-critical point: The case of electron-doped cuprates

Dominic Bergeron, Debanjan Chowdhury, Matthias Punk, Subir Sachdev, and A.-M. S. Tremblay
Phys. Rev. B 86, 155123 – Published 11 October 2012

Abstract

Many correlated materials display a quantum-critical point between a paramagnetic and a spin-density wave (SDW) state. The SDW wave vector connects points, so-called hot spots, on opposite sides of the Fermi surface. The Fermi velocities at these pairs of points are in general not parallel. Here, we consider the case where pairs of hot spots coalesce, and the wave vector (π,π) of the SDW connects hot spots with parallel Fermi velocities. Using the specific example of electron-doped cuprates, we first show that Kanamori screening and generic features of the Lindhard function make this case experimentally relevant. The temperature dependence of the correlation length, the spin susceptibility, and the self-energy at the hot spots are found using the two-particle self-consistent theory and specific numerical examples worked out for band and interaction parameters characteristic of the electron-doped cuprates. While the curvature of the Fermi surface at the hot spots leads to deviations from perfect nesting, the pseudonesting conditions lead to drastic modifications of the temperature dependence of these physical observables: Neglecting logarithmic corrections, the correlation length ξ scales like 1/T, namely, z=1 instead of the naive z=2, the (π,π) static spin susceptibility χ like 1/T, and the imaginary part of the self-energy at the hot spots like T3/2. The correction T11T3/2 to the Korringa NMR relaxation rate is subdominant. We also consider this problem at zero temperature, or for frequencies larger than temperature, using a field-theoretical model of gapless collective bosonic modes (SDW fluctuations) interacting with fermions. The imaginary part of the retarded fermionic self-energy close to the hot spots scales as ω3/2lnω. This is less singular than earlier predictions of the form ωlnω. The difference arises from the effects of umklapp terms that were not included in previous studies.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
5 More
  • Received 28 July 2012

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.86.155123

©2012 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Dominic Bergeron1, Debanjan Chowdhury2, Matthias Punk2, Subir Sachdev2, and A.-M. S. Tremblay1,3

  • 1Département de Physique and RQMP, Université de Sherbrooke, Sherbrooke QC J1K 2R1, Canada
  • 2Department of Physics, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
  • 3Canadian Institute for Advanced Research, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 86, Iss. 15 — 15 October 2012

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×