• Editors' Suggestion

Tin telluride: A weakly co-elastic metal

E. K. H. Salje, D. J. Safarik, K. A. Modic, J. E. Gubernatis, J. C. Cooley, R. D. Taylor, B. Mihaila, A. Saxena, T. Lookman, J. L. Smith, R. A. Fisher, M. Pasternak, C. P. Opeil, T. Siegrist, P. B. Littlewood, and J. C. Lashley
Phys. Rev. B 82, 184112 – Published 18 November 2010

Abstract

We report resonant ultrasound spectroscopy (RUS), dilatometry/magnetostriction, magnetotransport, magnetization, specific-heat, and S119n Mössbauer spectroscopy measurements on SnTe and Sn0.995Cr0.005Te. Hall measurements at T=77K indicate that our Bridgman-grown single crystals have a p-type carrier concentration of 3.4×1019cm3 and that our Cr-doped crystals have an n-type concentration of 5.8×1022cm3. Although our SnTe crystals are diamagnetic over the temperature range 2T1100K, the Cr-doped crystals are room-temperature ferromagnets with a Curie temperature of 294 K. For each sample type, three-terminal capacitive dilatometry measurements detect a subtle 0.5μm distortion at Tc85K. Whereas our RUS measurements on SnTe show elastic hardening near the structural transition, pointing to co-elastic behavior, similar measurements on Sn0.995Cr0.005Te show a pronounced softening, pointing to ferroelastic behavior. Effective Debye temperature, θD, values of SnTe obtained from S119n Mössbauer studies show a hardening of phonons in the range 60–115 K (θD=162K) as compared with the 100–300 K range (θD=150K). In addition, a precursor softening extending over approximately 100 K anticipates this collapse at the critical temperature and quantitative analysis over three decades of its reduced modulus finds ΔC44/C44=A|(TT0)/T0|κ with κ=0.50±0.02, a value indicating a three-dimensional softening of phonon branches at a temperature T075K, considerably below Tc. We suggest that the differences in these two types of elastic behaviors lie in the absence of elastic domain-wall motion in the one case and their nucleation in the other.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 3 October 2010

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.184112

©2010 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

E. K. H. Salje1,2, D. J. Safarik3, K. A. Modic3, J. E. Gubernatis3, J. C. Cooley3, R. D. Taylor3, B. Mihaila3, A. Saxena3, T. Lookman3, J. L. Smith3, R. A. Fisher4, M. Pasternak5, C. P. Opeil6, T. Siegrist7, P. B. Littlewood8, and J. C. Lashley3

  • 1Department of Earth Sciences, Cambridge University, Downing Street, Cambridge CB2 3EQ, United Kingdom
  • 2Center for Nonlinear Studies, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
  • 3Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
  • 4Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 5Tel Aviv University, Ramat Aviv 69978, Israel
  • 6Department of Physics, Boston College, Chestnut Hill, Massachusetts 02467, USA
  • 7National High Magnetic Field Laboratory, 1800 E Paul Dirac Drive, Tallahassee, Florida 32310, USA
  • 8Cavendish Laboratory, Cambridge University, Madingley Road, Cambridge CB3 0HE, United Kingdom

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 82, Iss. 18 — 1 November 2010

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×