Tensor product representation of a topological ordered phase: Necessary symmetry conditions

Xie Chen, Bei Zeng, Zheng-Cheng Gu, Isaac L. Chuang, and Xiao-Gang Wen
Phys. Rev. B 82, 165119 – Published 20 October 2010

Abstract

The tensor product representation of quantum states leads to a promising variational approach to study quantum phase and quantum phase transitions, especially topological ordered phases which are impossible to handle with conventional methods due to their long-range entanglement. However, an important issue arises when we use tensor product states (TPSs) as variational states to find the ground state of a Hamiltonian: can arbitrary variations in the tensors that represent ground state of a Hamiltonian be induced by local perturbations to the Hamiltonian? Starting from a tensor product state which is the exact ground state of a Hamiltonian with Z2 topological order, we show that, surprisingly, not all variations in the tensors correspond to the variation in the ground state caused by local perturbations of the Hamiltonian. Even in the absence of any symmetry requirement of the perturbed Hamiltonian, one necessary condition for the variations in the tensors to be physical is that they respect certain Z2 symmetry. We support this claim by calculating explicitly the change in topological entanglement entropy with different variations in the tensors. This finding will provide important guidance to numerical variational study of topological phase and phase transitions. It is also a crucial step in using TPS to study universal properties of a quantum phase and its topological order.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 1 April 2010

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.82.165119

©2010 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Xie Chen1, Bei Zeng2,3,4, Zheng-Cheng Gu5, Isaac L. Chuang1, and Xiao-Gang Wen1

  • 1Department of Physics, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02139, USA
  • 2Institute for Quantum Computing, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
  • 3Department of Combinatorics and Optimization, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
  • 4Department of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Guelph, Guelph, Ontario, Canada
  • 5Kavli Institute for Theoretical Physics, University of California, Santa Barbara, California 93106, USA

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 82, Iss. 16 — 15 October 2010

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×