Energy level spectroscopy of InSb quantum wells using quantum-well LED emission

T. G. Tenev, A. Palyi, B. I. Mirza, G. R. Nash, M. Fearn, S. J. Smith, L. Buckle, M. T. Emeny, T. Ashley, J. H. Jefferson, and C. J. Lambert
Phys. Rev. B 79, 085301 – Published 2 February 2009

Abstract

We have investigated the low-temperature optical properties of InSb quantum-well (QW) light-emitting diodes, with different barrier compositions, as a function of well width. Three devices were studied: QW1 had a 20 nm undoped InSb quantum well with a barrier composition of Al0.143In0.857Sb, QW2 had a 40 nm undoped InSb well with a barrier composition of Al0.077In0.923Sb, and QW3 had a 100 nm undoped InSb well with a barrier composition of Al0.025In0.975Sb. For QW1, the signature of two transitions (CB1-HH1 and CB1-HH2) can be seen in the measured spectrum, whereas for QW2 and QW3 the signature of a large number of transitions is present in the measured spectra. In particular transitions to HH2 can be seen, the first time this has been observed in AlInSb/InSb heterostructures. To identify the transitions that contribute to the measured spectra, the spectra have been simulated using an eight-band k.p calculation of the band structure together with a first-order time-dependent perturbation method (Fermi golden rule) calculation of spectral emittance, taking into account broadening. In general there is good agreement between the measured and simulated spectra. For QW2 we attribute the main peak in the experimental spectrum to the CB2-HH1 transition, which has the highest overall contribution to the emission spectrum of QW2 compared with all the other interband transitions. This transition normally falls into the category of “forbidden transitions,” and in order to understand this behavior we have investigated the momentum matrix elements, which determine the selection rules of the problem.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 11 July 2008

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.79.085301

©2009 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

T. G. Tenev and A. Palyi*

  • Department of Physics, University of Lancaster, Lancaster LA1 4YB, United Kingdom

B. I. Mirza

  • Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Photonics Group, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1UB, United Kingdom

G. R. Nash

  • QinetiQ, Malvern Technology Centre, Malvern WR14 3PS, United Kingdom and Department of Electrical and Electronic Engineering, Photonics Group, University of Bristol, Bristol BS8 1UB, United Kingdom

M. Fearn, S. J. Smith, L. Buckle, M. T. Emeny, T. Ashley, and J. H. Jefferson

  • QinetiQ, Malvern Technology Centre, Malvern WR14 3PS, United Kingdom

C. J. Lambert

  • Department of Physics, University of Lancaster, Lancaster LA1 4YB, United Kingdom

  • *Present address: Department of Physics of Complex Systems, Eötvös Loránd University, H-1518 Budapest, Hungary.
  • Corresponding author; grnash@qinetiq.com

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 79, Iss. 8 — 15 February 2009

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×