Orientation-dependent NMR study of the giant-unit-cell intermetallics βAl3Mg2, Bergman-phase Mg32(Al,Zn)49, and ξAl74Pd22Mn4

P. Jeglič, M. Komelj, M. Klanjšek, U. Tkalec, S. Vrtnik, M. Feuerbacher, and J. Dolinšek
Phys. Rev. B 75, 014202 – Published 3 January 2007

Abstract

We present a Al27 NMR study of three giant-unit-cell complex metallic compounds, βAl3Mg2, the “Bergman-phase” Mg32(Al,Zn)49, and ξAlPdMn, which contain some hundreds up to more than a thousand atoms in the unit cell. The NMR spectra of monocrystalline samples are strongly inhomogeneously broadened by the electric quadrupole interaction and the line shapes are featureless and powderlike, but still exhibit significant orientation-dependent variation of the intensity on the satellite part of the spectrum in the magnetic field. Measuring orientation-dependent satellite intensity in appropriate frequency windows yields rotation patterns that can be related to the structure and symmetry of the giant unit cells. For a theoretical reproduction of the rotation patterns, we derived a distribution of the electric-field-gradient (EFG) tensors for each of the investigated compounds from existing structural models using point-charge and ab initio calculations. The EFG distribution yields important structural information on the manifold of different local atomic environments in the unit cell and distinguishes crystallographically inequivalent lattice sites from the equivalent ones. The distribution of the EFGs for the 1168-atom unit cell of βAl3Mg2 was successfully determined by a point-charge calculation, whereas the ab initio approach was successful for the 160-atom unit cell of the Mg32(Al,Zn)49 Bergman phase. For the 258-atom unit cell of ξAlPdMn, the experimental rotation patterns revealed a pseudotenfold symmetry, whereas the theoretical point-charge calculation revealed predominant twofold symmetry with traces of tenfold symmetry, so that no quantitative matching between the theory and experiment could be obtained.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
8 More
  • Received 12 October 2006

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.75.014202

©2007 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

P. Jeglič1, M. Komelj1, M. Klanjšek1, U. Tkalec1, S. Vrtnik1, M. Feuerbacher2, and J. Dolinšek1

  • 1J. Stefan Institute, University of Ljubljana, Jamova 39, SI-1000 Ljubljana, Slovenia
  • 2Institut für Festkörperforschung, Forschungszentrum Jülich, Jülich D-52425, Germany

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 75, Iss. 1 — 1 January 2007

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×