Structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of a Mn monolayer on W(110)

M. Bode, S. Heinze, A. Kubetzka, O. Pietzsch, M. Hennefarth, M. Getzlaff, R. Wiesendanger, X. Nie, G. Bihlmayer, and S. Blügel
Phys. Rev. B 66, 014425 – Published 12 July 2002
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

In this paper we establish a monolayer of Mn on W(110) as a model system for two-dimensional itinerant antiferromagnetism. Combining scanning tunneling microscopy (STM), low-energy electron diffraction, and ab initio calculations performed with the full-potential linearized augmented plane wave method we have studied the structural, electronic, and magnetic properties of a Mn monolayer on W(110). Our experimental results indicate that in spite of the huge tensile strain Mn grows pseudomorphically on W(110) up to a thickness of three monolayers. Intermixing between the Mn overlayer and the W substrate can be excluded. Using these structural data as a starting point for the ab initio calculations of one monolayer Mn on W(110) we conclude that (i) Mn is magnetic and exhibits a large magnetic moment of 3.32μB, (ii) the magnetic moments are arranged in a c(2×2) antiferromagnetic order, (iii) the easy axis of the magnetization is in plane and points along the [11¯0] direction, i.e., the direction along the long side of the (110) surface unit cell with a magnetocrystalline anisotropy energy of 1.3–1.5 meV, and (iv) the Mn-W interlayer distance is 2.14 Å. The calculated electronic structure of a Mn monolayer on W(110) is compared with experimental scanning tunneling spectroscopy results. Several aspects are in nice agreement, but one cannot unambiguously deduce the magnetic structure from such a comparison. The proposed two-dimensional antiferromagnetic ground state of a Mn monolayer on W(110) is directly verified by the use of spin-polarized STM (SP-STM) in the constant-current mode, and an in-plane easy magnetization axis could be confirmed using tips with different magnetization directions. We compare the measurements with theoretically determined SP-STM images calculated combining the Tersoff-Hamann model extended to SP-STM with the ab initio calculation, resulting in good agreement.

  • Received 30 August 2001

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.66.014425

©2002 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

M. Bode1,*, S. Heinze1,2,†, A. Kubetzka1, O. Pietzsch1, M. Hennefarth1, M. Getzlaff1, R. Wiesendanger1, X. Nie2, G. Bihlmayer2, and S. Blügel2,‡

  • 1Institute of Applied Physics and Microstructure Research Center, University of Hamburg, Jungiusstrasse 11, D-20355 Hamburg, Germany
  • 2Institut für Festkörperforschung, Forschungszentrum Jülich, D–52425 Jülich, Germany

  • *Email address: mbode@physnet.uni-hamburg.de
  • Present address: IBM Research Division, T.J. Watson Research Center, Yorktown Heights, 10598 NY.
  • Permanent address: Fachbereich Physik, Universität Osnabrück, 49069 Osnabrück, Germany.

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 66, Iss. 1 — 1 July 2002

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×