Effective Electron-Hole Interactions in Polar Semiconductors

S. D. Mahanti and C. M. Varma
Phys. Rev. B 6, 2209 – Published 15 September 1972
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

We study the problem of an electron and a hole interacting with each other and with longitudinal optical phonons. Our method consists of examining the poles of the t matrix for dressed-particle-hole scattering due to the Coulomb interaction and the exchange of phonons. This approach is carried out in the two limits: (i) EBω0 and (ii) EBω0, where EB is the binding energy of the exciton state formed and ω0 is the optical phonon energy. In both cases, we have an effective-mass equation for the electron-hole pair with the same form of nonlocal potential: however, in case (i) the self-energies occurring are polaron self-energies, while in case (ii) the self-energies are eliminated. We find that the first corrections in both limits are more important for the self-energy than for the interaction potential. We make the ansatz that this is true for arbitrary values of EBω0 so that the potential is left unaltered, but the self-energy scales with the parameter EBω0. The calculated binding energies obtained from this procedure are in excellent agreement with the measured binding energy of excitons in a variety of ionic semiconductors. The effective nonlocal potential we obtain satisfies the physical requirements of going asymptotically to (ε0r)1, where ε0 is the static dielectric constant, for rpolaronradius and EBω01, and to (εr)1, where ε is the high-frequency dielectric constant for rpolaronradius, and EBω01. The first corrections go as r2. We discuss in detail the form of the potential and its nonlocality, etc., as the parameters EBω0, εε0, and memh (ratio of electron mass to hole mass) vary. We define EB as the energy to separate to infinity the electron and the hole without altering the self-energy they have in the bound state. For appreciable electron-phonon coupling strength, EB and EB differ considerably. The exciton radius and the oscillator strength is to be estimated from EB. For TlCl, the actual exciton radius is estimated to be about three times smaller than one might estimate from EB.

  • Received 24 May 1971

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.6.2209

©1972 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

S. D. Mahanti*

  • Michigan State University, East Lansing, Michigan 48823

C. M. Varma

  • Bell Telephone Laboratories, Murray Hill, New Jersey 07974

  • *Work was started while at Bell Telephone Laboratories, Murray Hill, N. J. 07974.
  • On leave of absence for the year 1971-72 at Department of Physics, University of Chicago, Chicago, Ill. 60637.

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 6, Iss. 6 — 15 September 1972

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×