Atomistic structural mechanism for the glass transition: Entropic contribution

Dong Han, Dan Wei, Jie Yang, Hui-Ling Li, Min-Qiang Jiang, Yun-Jiang Wang, Lan-Hong Dai, and Alessio Zaccone
Phys. Rev. B 101, 014113 – Published 28 January 2020

Abstract

A popular Adam-Gibbs scenario has suggested that the excess entropy of glass and liquid over crystal dominates the dynamical arrest at the glass transition with exclusive contribution from configurational entropy over vibrational entropy. However, an intuitive structural rationale for the emergence of frozen dynamics in relation to entropy is still lacking. Here we study these issues by atomistically simulating the vibrational, configurational, as well as total entropy of a model glass former over their crystalline counterparts for the entire temperature range spanning from glass to liquid. Besides confirming the Adam-Gibbs entropy scenario, the concept of Shannon information entropy is introduced to characterize the diversity of atomic-level structures, which undergoes a striking variation across the glass transition, and explains the change found in the excess configurational entropy. Hence, the hidden structural mechanism underlying the entropic kink at the transition is revealed in terms of proliferation of certain atomic structures with a higher degree of centrosymmetry, which are more rigid and possess less nonaffine softening modes. In turn, the proliferation of these centrosymmetric (rigid) structures leads to the freezing-in of the dynamics beyond which further structural rearrangements become highly unfavorable, thus explaining the kink in the configurational entropy at the transition.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 9 July 2019
  • Revised 16 January 2020

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevB.101.014113

©2020 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

  1. Physical Systems
Condensed Matter, Materials & Applied Physics

Authors & Affiliations

Dong Han1,2, Dan Wei1,2, Jie Yang1,2, Hui-Ling Li1,2, Min-Qiang Jiang1,2, Yun-Jiang Wang1,2,*, Lan-Hong Dai1,2,†, and Alessio Zaccone3,4,5,‡

  • 1State Key Laboratory of Nonlinear Mechanics, Institute of Mechanics, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100190, China
  • 2School of Engineering Science, University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China
  • 3Department of Physics A. Pontremoli, University of Milan, via Celoria 16, 20133 Milan, Italy
  • 4Cavendish Laboratory, University of Cambridge, JJ Thomson Avenue, Cambridge, CB3 0HE United Kingdom
  • 5Statistical Physics Group, Department of Chemical Engineering and Biotechnology, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, CB3 0AS, United Kingdom

  • *yjwang@imech.ac.cn
  • lhdai@lnm.imech.ac.cn
  • az302@cam.ac.uk

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 101, Iss. 1 — 1 January 2020

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review B

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×