Meniscus Oscillations Driven by Flow Focusing Lead to Bubble Pinch-Off and Entrainment in a Piezoacoustic Inkjet Nozzle

Arjan Fraters, Maaike Rump, Roger Jeurissen, Marc van den Berg, Youri de Loore, Hans Reinten, Herman Wijshoff, Devaraj van der Meer, Detlef Lohse, Michel Versluis, and Tim Segers
Phys. Rev. Applied 16, 044052 – Published 27 October 2021

Abstract

The stability of high-end piezoacoustic drop-on-demand (DOD) inkjet printing is sometimes compromised by the entrainment of an air bubble inside the ink channel. Here, bubble pinch-off from an oscillating meniscus is studied in an optically transparent DOD printhead as a function of the driving waveform. We show that bubble pinch-off follows from low-amplitude high-frequency meniscus oscillations on top of the global high-amplitude low-frequency meniscus motion that drives droplet formation. In a certain window of control parameters, phase inversion between the low- and high-frequency components leads to the enclosure of an air cavity and bubble pinch-off. Although phenomenologically similar, bubble pinch-off is not a result of capillary-wave interaction such as observed in drop impact on a liquid pool. Instead, we reveal geometrical-flow focusing as the mechanism through which, at first, an outward jet is formed on the retracted concave meniscus. The subsequent high-frequency velocity oscillation acts on the now toroidal-shaped meniscus and it accelerates the toroidal ring outward, resulting in the formation of an air cavity that can pinch off. Through incompressible boundary-integral simulations, we reveal that bubble pinch-off requires an unbalance between the capillary and inertial time scales and that it does not require acoustics. The critical control parameters for pinch-off are the pulse timing and amplitude. To cure the bubble entrainment problem, the threshold for bubble pinch-off can be increased by suppressing the high-frequency driving through appropriate waveform design. The present work therefore aids the improvement of the stability of inkjet printers through a physical understanding of meniscus instabilities.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
2 More
  • Received 3 May 2021
  • Revised 13 July 2021
  • Accepted 1 October 2021
  • Corrected 11 November 2021

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevApplied.16.044052

© 2021 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Fluid Dynamics

Corrections

11 November 2021

Correction: The previously published Figure 6 contained incomplete images in parts (e) and (g) and has been replaced.

Authors & Affiliations

Arjan Fraters1, Maaike Rump1, Roger Jeurissen2, Marc van den Berg3, Youri de Loore3, Hans Reinten3, Herman Wijshoff3,4, Devaraj van der Meer1, Detlef Lohse1, Michel Versluis1, and Tim Segers5,1,*

  • 1Physics of Fluids group, Max-Planck Center Twente for Complex Fluid Dynamics, Department of Science and Technology, MESA+ Institute, and J. M. Burgers Centre for Fluid Dynamics, University of Twente, 7522 NB Enschede, Netherlands
  • 2Department of Applied Physics, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
  • 3Canon Production Printing Netherlands B.V., 5914 HH Venlo, Netherlands
  • 4Department of Mechanical Engineering, Eindhoven University of Technology, 5600 MB Eindhoven, Netherlands
  • 5BIOS Lab-on-a-Chip group, Max-Planck Center Twente for Complex Fluid Dynamics, MESA+ Institute for Nanotechnology, University of Twente, 7522 NH Enschede, Netherlands

  • *t.j.segers@utwente.nl

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 16, Iss. 4 — October 2021

Subject Areas
Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Applied

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×