Tracing intermolecular Coulombic decay of carbon-dioxide dimers and oxygen dimers after valence photoionization

W. Iskandar, A. S. Gatton, B. Gaire, F. P. Sturm, K. A. Larsen, E. G. Champenois, N. Shivaram, A. Moradmand, J. B. Williams, B. Berry, T. Severt, I. Ben-Itzhak, D. Metz, H. Sann, M. Weller, M. Schoeffler, T. Jahnke, R. Dörner, D. Slaughter, and Th. Weber
Phys. Rev. A 99, 043414 – Published 15 April 2019

Abstract

We have conducted an experimental study on the photo double ionization (PDI) of carbon-dioxide dimers at photon energies of 37 and 55 eV and oxygen dimers at photon energies of 38, 41.5, and 46 eV, while focusing on the dissociation dynamics upon single-photon absorption. The investigation was performed by applying the cold-target recoil-ion momentum spectroscopy method in order to collect and record the three-dimensional momenta of the ionic fragments and emitted electrons from the dissociating dimer in coincidence. The kinetic-energy release upon fragmentation and the electron angular distributions in the laboratory and body-fixed frames, as well as the relative electron-electron emission angle, show unambiguous experimental evidence of intermolecular Coulombic decay (ICD) in carbon-dioxide dimers upon photoionization below and above the double-ionization threshold of CO2 monomers. The PDI of oxygen dimers is less conclusive and shows contributions from ICD and knock-off ionization mechanisms. As for atomic dimers, the present results reveal that ICD in CO2 dimers after valence PDI can also serve as a source for low-energy electrons, known to be very relevant in biological systems, cells, and tissues.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
1 More
  • Received 7 January 2019

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.043414

©2019 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Atomic, Molecular & Optical

Authors & Affiliations

W. Iskandar1,*, A. S. Gatton1, B. Gaire1, F. P. Sturm1, K. A. Larsen1,2, E. G. Champenois1,2, N. Shivaram1, A. Moradmand3, J. B. Williams4, B. Berry5, T. Severt5, I. Ben-Itzhak5, D. Metz6, H. Sann6, M. Weller6, M. Schoeffler6, T. Jahnke6, R. Dörner6, D. Slaughter1, and Th. Weber1,†

  • 1Chemical Sciences Division, Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 2Graduate Group in Applied Science and Technology, University of California, Berkeley, California 94720, USA
  • 3Department of Physics, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849, USA
  • 4Department of Physics, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA
  • 5J. R. Macdonald Laboratory, Department of Physics, Kansas State University, Manhattan, Kansas 66506, USA
  • 6Institut für Kernphysik, Goethe-Universitaet, Max-von-Laue-Strasse 1, D-60438 Frankfurt am Main, Germany

  • *wiskandar@lbl.gov
  • tweber@lbl.gov

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 99, Iss. 4 — April 2019

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×