Wigner time delay in photodetachment

Soumyajit Saha, Jobin Jose, Pranawa C. Deshmukh, G. Aravind, Valeriy K. Dolmatov, Anatoli S. Kheifets, and Steven T. Manson
Phys. Rev. A 99, 043407 – Published 8 April 2019

Abstract

Using Cl as a test case, Wigner time delay in the photodetachment process has been investigated theoretically, along with the photoionization of the isoelectronic Ar atom, for the outer 3p shell using the relativistic-random-phase approximation (RRPA). Time delay was probed in these systems from threshold to 80 eV, to investigate threshold effects, the centrifugal barrier shape resonance, and the Cooper minimum region. This study focuses on Cl because, for negative ions, the phase of the photoemission process is not dominated by the Coulomb phase as it is in photoionization. The results show significant differences, both qualitative and quantitative, between the time delays for Cl and Ar photoemission at low photoelectron energy, but they are rather similar in the Cooper minimum region, where the Coulomb phase is small. In particular, the Wigner time delay in Cl exhibits a dramatic energy dependence just above threshold, and a rapidly increasing time delay in the vicinity of the shape resonance. A strong angular dependence of time delay has also been found near the threshold region for the Cl case, and is absent in the case of the photoionization of Ar. The origin of these phenomenologies is explained and a prospectus for future work is presented.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 20 January 2019

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.99.043407

©2019 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Atomic, Molecular & Optical

Authors & Affiliations

Soumyajit Saha1,*, Jobin Jose2,†, Pranawa C. Deshmukh3,4,‡, G. Aravind1,§, Valeriy K. Dolmatov5,∥, Anatoli S. Kheifets6,¶, and Steven T. Manson7,#

  • 1Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Madras, Chennai, Tamil Nadu 600036, India
  • 2Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Patna, Bihta, Bihar 801013, India
  • 3Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Technology Tirupati, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh 517506, India
  • 4Department of Physics, Indian Institute of Science Education and Research Tirupati, Tirupati, Andhra Pradesh 517507, India
  • 5Department of Physics and Earth Science, University of North Alabama, Florence, Alabama 35632, USA
  • 6Research School of Physics and Engineering, The Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia
  • 7Department of Physics and Astronomy, Georgia State University, Atlanta, Georgia 30303, USA

  • *soumyajit147@gmail.com
  • jobin.jose@iitp.ac.in
  • pcd@iittp.ac.in
  • §garavind@iitm.ac.in
  • vkdolmatov@una.edu
  • a.kheifets@anu.edu.au
  • #smanson@gsu.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 99, Iss. 4 — April 2019

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×