Randomized benchmarking with restricted gate sets

Winton G. Brown and Bryan Eastin
Phys. Rev. A 97, 062323 – Published 15 June 2018

Abstract

Standard randomized benchmarking protocols entail sampling from a unitary 2-design, which is not always practical. In this article we examine randomized benchmarking protocols based on subgroups of the Clifford group that are not unitary 2-designs. We introduce a general method for analyzing such protocols and subsequently apply it to two subgroups, the group generated by controlled-not, Hadamard, and Pauli gates and that generated by only controlled-not and Pauli gates. In both cases the error probability can be estimated to within a factor of 2 or less where the factor can be arranged to be conservative and to decay exponentially in the number of qubits. For randomized benchmarking of logical qubits even better accuracy will typically be obtained. Thus, we show that sampling a distribution which is close to a unitary 2-design, although sufficient, is not necessary for randomized benchmarking to high accuracy.

  • Received 26 January 2018

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.97.062323

©2018 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

  1. Research Areas
Quantum Information, Science & Technology

Authors & Affiliations

Winton G. Brown* and Bryan Eastin

  • Northrop Grumman Corporation, Falls Church, Virginia 22042, USA

  • *winton.brown@ngc.com

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 97, Iss. 6 — June 2018

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×