Propensity for distinguishing two free electrons with equal energies in electron-impact ionization of helium

Xueguang Ren, Arne Senftleben, Thomas Pflüger, Klaus Bartschat, Oleg Zatsarinny, Jamal Berakdar, James Colgan, Michael S. Pindzola, Igor Bray, Dmitry V. Fursa, and Alexander Dorn
Phys. Rev. A 92, 052707 – Published 16 November 2015

Abstract

We report a combined experimental and theoretical study on the electron-impact ionization of helium at E0=70.6eV and equal energy sharing of the two outgoing electrons (E1=E2=23eV), where a double-peak or dip structure in the binary region of the triple differential cross section is observed. The experimental cross sections are compared with results from convergent close-coupling (CCC), B-spline R-matrix-with-pseudostates (BSR), and time-dependent close-coupling (TDCC) calculations, as well as predictions from the dynamic screening three-Coulomb (DS3C) theory. Excellent agreement is obtained between experiment and the nonperturbative CCC, BSR, and TDCC theories, and good agreement is also found for the DS3C model. The data are further analyzed regarding contributions in particular coupling schemes for the spins of either the two outgoing electrons or one of the outgoing electrons and the 1s electron remaining in the residual ion. While both coupling schemes can be used to explain the observed double-peak structure in the cross section, the second one allows for the isolation of the exchange contribution between the incident projectile and the target. For different observation angles of the two outgoing electrons, we interpret the results as a propensity for distinguishing these two electrons—one being more likely the incident projectile and the other one being more likely ejected from the target.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 27 August 2015

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.92.052707

©2015 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Xueguang Ren1,2,*, Arne Senftleben2,3, Thomas Pflüger2, Klaus Bartschat4, Oleg Zatsarinny4, Jamal Berakdar5, James Colgan6, Michael S. Pindzola7, Igor Bray8, Dmitry V. Fursa8, and Alexander Dorn2

  • 1Physikalisch-Technische Bundesanstalt, D-38116 Braunschweig, Germany
  • 2Max-Planck-Institut für Kernphysik, D-69117 Heidelberg, Germany
  • 3Universität Kassel, Institut für Physik, Heinrich-Plett-Strasse 40, D-34132 Kassel, Germany
  • 4Department of Physics and Astronomy, Drake University, Des Moines, Iowa 50311, USA
  • 5Institut für Physik, Martin-Luther Universität Halle-Wittenberg, D-06099 Halle/Saale, Germany
  • 6Theoretical Division, Los Alamos National Laboratory, Los Alamos, New Mexico 87545, USA
  • 7Department of Physics, Auburn University, Auburn, Alabama 36849, USA
  • 8Curtin Institute for Computation and Department of Physics and Astronomy, Curtin University, GPO Box U1987, Perth WA6845, Australia

  • *ren@mpi-hd.mpg.de

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 92, Iss. 5 — November 2015

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×