High-accuracy x-ray line standards in the 3-keV region

S. Schlesser, S. Boucard, D. S. Covita, J. M. F. dos Santos, H. Fuhrmann, D. Gotta, A. Gruber, M. Hennebach, A. Hirtl, P. Indelicato, E.-O. Le Bigot, L. M. Simons, L. Stingelin, M. Trassinelli, J. F. C. A. Veloso, A. Wasser, and J. Zmeskal
Phys. Rev. A 88, 022503 – Published 6 August 2013

Abstract

A set of 14 high-accuracy x-ray transition energies in the 2.4–3.1 keV range is presented, which can be used as x-ray standards. They were measured in two- to four-electron sulfur, chlorine, and argon ions produced in an electron-cyclotron resonance ion source, using a single spherically bent crystal spectrometer. The results include the first measurement of six transitions and improve the accuracy of six other experimental values. These measurements considerably extend the set of high-accuracy x-ray energies reported for highly charged ions. Their relative uncertainties range from 1 to 10 ppm. Theory only reaches such a precision in one- and two-electron ions. Our results thus have two distinct applications. On the one hand, they test predictions in two-electron ions [Artemyev, Shabaev, Yerokhin, Plunien, and Soff, Phys. Rev. A 71, 062104 (2005)], at the precision level of some two-photon QED contributions. We observe an agreement with theory for most of the transitions. On the other hand, the three- and four-electron ion transitions provide new benchmark energies for the calculation of missing theoretical contributions, such as Auger shifts or electronic correlations. Spectra were analyzed with an x-ray tracing simulation that contains all the relevant physics of the spectrometer.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 3 April 2013

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.88.022503

©2013 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

S. Schlesser1,2,*, S. Boucard1, D. S. Covita3,4, J. M. F. dos Santos3, H. Fuhrmann5, D. Gotta6, A. Gruber5,†, M. Hennebach6,‡, A. Hirtl5,†, P. Indelicato1, E.-O. Le Bigot1,§, L. M. Simons7, L. Stingelin7, M. Trassinelli8, J. F. C. A. Veloso4, A. Wasser7, and J. Zmeskal5

  • 1Laboratoire Kastler Brossel, Ecole Normale Supérieure, CNRS et Université Pierre et Marie Curie-Paris 6, Case 74, 4 place Jussieu, F-75005 Paris, France
  • 2KVI, University of Groningen, Zernikelaan 25, NL-9747 AA Groningen, The Netherlands
  • 3Department of Physics, Coimbra University, P-3000 Coimbra, Portugal
  • 4I3N, Physics Department, University of Aveiro, P-3810-193 Aveiro, Portugal
  • 5Stefan Meyer Institute for Subatomic Physics, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Boltzmanngasse 3, 1090 Vienna, Austria
  • 6Institut für Kernphysik, Forschungszentrum Jülich, D-52425 Jülich, Germany
  • 7Paul Scherrer Institut, Villigen PSI, CH-5232 Villigen, Switzerland
  • 8Institut des NanoSciences de Paris, CNRS-UMR 7588, Sorbonne-Université Pierre et Marie Curie, 4 place Jussieu, 75005 Paris, France

  • *Corresponding author: s.s.schlesser@rug.nl
  • Current address: Department of Biomedical Imaging and Image-guided Therapy, Medical University of Vienna, A-1090 Vienna, Austria.
  • Current address: Areva NP GmbH, D-63067 Offenbach, Germany.
  • §Corresponding author: eric.lebigot@normalesup.org

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 88, Iss. 2 — August 2013

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×