Finite-time quantum-to-classical transition for a Schrödinger-cat state

Janika Paavola, Michael J. W. Hall, Matteo G. A. Paris, and Sabrina Maniscalco
Phys. Rev. A 84, 012121 – Published 27 July 2011

Abstract

The transition from quantum to classical, in the case of a quantum harmonic oscillator, is typically identified with the transition from a quantum superposition of macroscopically distinguishable states, such as the Schrödinger-cat state, into the corresponding statistical mixture. This transition is commonly characterized by the asymptotic loss of the interference term in the Wigner representation of the cat state. In this paper we show that the quantum-to-classical transition has different dynamical features depending on the measure for nonclassicality used. Measures based on an operatorial definition have well-defined physical meaning and allow a deeper understanding of the quantum-to-classical transition. Our analysis shows that, for most nonclassicality measures, the Schrödinger-cat state becomes classical after a finite time. Moreover, our results challenge the prevailing idea that more macroscopic states are more susceptible to decoherence in the sense that the transition from quantum to classical occurs faster. Since nonclassicality is a prerequisite for entanglement generation our results also bridge the gap between decoherence, which is lost only asymptotically, and entanglement, which may show a “sudden death.” In fact, whereas the loss of coherences still remains asymptotic, we emphasize that the transition from quantum to classical can indeed occur at a finite time.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 22 March 2011

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.84.012121

©2011 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Janika Paavola1,*, Michael J. W. Hall2, Matteo G. A. Paris3,4,†, and Sabrina Maniscalco1,5,‡

  • 1Turku Centre for Quantum Physics, Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Turku, FI-20014 Turun yliopisto, Finland
  • 2Theoretical Physics, Research School of Physics and Engineering, Australian National University, Canberra ACT 0200, Australia
  • 3Dipartimento di Fisica dell'Universit‘a degli Studi di Milano, I-20133 Milano, Italia
  • 4CNISM, Udr Milano, I-20133 Milano, Italy
  • 5SUPA, EPS/Physics, Heriot-Watt University, Edinburgh EH14 4AS, United Kingdom

  • *janika.paavola@utu.fi; www.openq.fi
  • matteo.paris@fisica.unimi.it
  • s.maniscalco@hw.ac.uk; www.openq.fi

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 84, Iss. 1 — July 2011

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×