Reply to “Comment on ‘Mutually unbiased bases, orthogonal Latin squares, and hidden-variable models’ ”

Tomasz Paterek, Borivoje Dakić, and Časlav Brukner
Phys. Rev. A 83, 036102 – Published 30 March 2011

Abstract

In this Reply to the preceding Comment by Hall and Rao [Phys. Rev. A 83, 036101 (2011)], we motivate terminology of our original paper and point out that further research is needed in order to (dis)prove the claimed link between every orthogonal Latin square of order being a power of a prime and a mutually unbiased basis.

  • Received 28 February 2011

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.83.036102

©2011 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Tomasz Paterek1, Borivoje Dakić2,3, and Časlav Brukner2,3

  • 1Centre for Quantum Technologies, National University of Singapore, 3 Science Drive 2, 117543 Singapore, Singapore
  • 2Institute for Quantum Optics and Quantum Information, Austrian Academy of Sciences, Boltzmanngasse 3, A-1090 Wien, Austria
  • 3Faculty of Physics, University of Vienna, Boltzmanngasse 5, A-1090 Wien, Austria

Comments & Replies

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

Original Article

Mutually unbiased bases, orthogonal Latin squares, and hidden-variable models

Tomasz Paterek, Borivoje Dakić, and Časlav Brukner
Phys. Rev. A 79, 012109 (2009)

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 83, Iss. 3 — March 2011

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×