Optical quenching of metastable magnesium

Nils Rehbein, Tanja E. Mehlstäubler, Jochen Keupp, Karsten Moldenhauer, Ernst M. Rasel, Wolfgang Ertmer, Albane Douillet, Volker Michels, Sergey G. Porsev, Andrei Derevianko, Charlotte Froese Fischer, Georgio I. Tachiev, and Vitaly G. Pal’chikov
Phys. Rev. A 76, 043406 – Published 8 October 2007

Abstract

Doppler cooling on narrow transitions has become a crucial technique for preparing ultracold samples of alkaline-earth-metal and alkaline-earth-metal-like atoms. For lighter species, such as calcium and magnesium, this technique relies on artificial broadening (quenching) of the upper level of the narrow line. We report on quenching experiments on a Mg24 atomic beam. The branching ratio of the (3s4s)1S0 state was determined to be β=(1.33±0.53)×105 from the measured quenching efficiency. The branching ratio combined with the known linewidth of this state yields a transition rate for (3s3p)3P1(3s4s)1S0 of Γ23=283±114s1, i.e., one order of magnitude smaller than estimated from semiempirical data. We have applied different numerical approaches, including ab initio relativistic many-body calculations, to compute the transition probabilities of the (3s3p)3P1(3s4s)1S0 and (3s3p)1P1(3s4s)1S0 transitions. The results are in good agreement with our experimental observation. With the measured branching ratio, we expect a transfer efficiency of Doppler-cooled atoms into a quench magneto-optical trap (QuenchMOT) of approximately 1% for our experimental parameters. According to our simulations, the transfer efficiency can be increased by one order of magnitude for lower ensemble temperatures as recently demonstrated by two-photon cooling in our uv MOT.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 24 September 2006

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.76.043406

©2007 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Nils Rehbein, Tanja E. Mehlstäubler, Jochen Keupp, Karsten Moldenhauer, Ernst M. Rasel*, and Wolfgang Ertmer

  • Institut für Quantenoptik, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Welfengarten 1, 30167 Hannover, Germany

Albane Douillet

  • Laboratoire Kastler Brossel, Université Pierre et Marie Curie, Case 74, 4 Place Jussieu, 75252 Paris, France and Département de Physique et Modélisation, Université d’Evry Val d’Essonne, Boulevard F. Mitterand, 91025 Evry cedex, France

Volker Michels

  • Deutsches Elektronen Synchrotron, Notkestrasse 85, 22607 Hamburg, Germany

Sergey G. Porsev

  • Petersburg Nuclear Physics Institute, Gatchina, Leningrad district, 188300 Russia

Andrei Derevianko

  • Physics Department, University of Nevada, Reno, Nevada 89557, USA

Charlotte Froese Fischer and Georgio I. Tachiev

  • Department of Computer Science, Vanderbilt University, Box 1679B, Nashville, Tennessee 37235, USA

Vitaly G. Pal’chikov

  • Institute for Time and Space at National Research Institute for Physical-Technical and Radiotechnical Measurements, Mendeleevo, Moscow Region, 141579 Russia

  • *rasel@iqo.uni-hannover.de

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 76, Iss. 4 — October 2007

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×