Abstract
This Comment discusses a paper by ], a Comment thereon by ], and an Erratum to that Comment []. An important further misprint beyond those cited by Sims and Hagstrom is identified, and misprints in the prior Comment (and not corrected in its Erratum) are pointed out. Calculations are performed to confirm that, with the corrections found to date, all Remiddi’s integral formulas are now in a consistent, correct form.
- Received 4 January 2004
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.69.056501
©2004 American Physical Society
