Quantum nonlocality, Bell inequalities, and the memory loophole

Jonathan Barrett, Daniel Collins, Lucien Hardy, Adrian Kent, and Sandu Popescu
Phys. Rev. A 66, 042111 – Published 21 October 2002
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

In the analysis of experiments designed to reveal violation of Bell-type inequalities, it is usually assumed that any hidden variables associated with the nth particle pair would be independent of measurement choices and outcomes for the first (n1) pairs. Models which violate this assumption exploit what we call the memory loophole. We focus on the strongest type of violation, which uses the two-sided memory loophole, in which the hidden variables for pair n can depend on the previous measurement choices and outcomes in both wings of the experiment. We show that the two-sided memory loophole allows a systematic violation of the Clauser-Horne-Shimony-Holt (CHSH) inequality when the data are analyzed in the standard way, but cannot produce a violation if a CHSH expression depending linearly on the data is used. In the first case, the maximal CHSH violation becomes small as the number of particle pairs tested becomes large. Hence, although in principle the memory loophole implies a slight flaw in the existing analyses of Bell experiments, the data still strongly confirm quantum mechanics against local hidden variables. We consider also a related loophole, the simultaneous measurement loophole, which applies if all measurements on each side are carried out simultaneously. We show that this can increase the probability of violating the linearized CHSH inequality as well as other Bell-type inequalities.

  • Received 27 May 2002

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.66.042111

©2002 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Jonathan Barrett1, Daniel Collins2,3, Lucien Hardy4, Adrian Kent3,*, and Sandu Popescu2,3

  • 1DAMTP, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 OWA, United Kingdom
  • 2H. H. Wills Physics Laboratory, University of Bristol, Tyndall Avenue, Bristol BS8 1TL, United Kingdom
  • 3Hewlett-Packard Laboratories, Filton Road, Stoke Gifford, Bristol BS34 8QZ, United Kingdom
  • 4Centre for Quantum Computation, Clarendon Laboratory, Parks Road, Oxford OX1 3PU, United Kingdom

  • *On leave from DAMTP, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 OWA, U.K.

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 66, Iss. 4 — October 2002

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×