Reply to “Comment on ‘Validity of Feynman’s prescription of disregarding the Pauli principle in intermediate states’ ”

F. A. B. Coutinho, Y. Nogami, and Lauro Tomio
Phys. Rev. A 62, 016102 – Published 8 June 2000
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

In a recent paper, we raised a question on the validity of Feynman’s prescription of disregarding the Pauli principle in intermediate states of perturbation theory. In the preceding Comment, Cavalcanti correctly pointed out that Feynman’s prescription is consistent with the exact solution of the model that we used. This means that the Pauli principle does not necessarily apply to intermediate states. We discuss implications of this puzzling aspect.

  • Received 19 January 2000

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.62.016102

©2000 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

F. A. B. Coutinho1, Y. Nogami2, and Lauro Tomio3

  • 1Faculdade de Medicina, Universidade de São Paulo, Avenida Dr. Arnaldo, 455, 01246-903 São Paulo, Brazil
  • 2Department of Physics and Astronomy, McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8S 4M1
  • 3Instituto de Física Teórica, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Rua Pamplona, 145, 01405-900 São Paulo, Brazil

Comments & Replies

Original Article

Validity of Feynman’s prescription of disregarding the Pauli principle in intermediate states

F. A. B. Coutinho, Y. Nogami, and Lauro Tomio
Phys. Rev. A 59, 2624 (1999)

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 62, Iss. 1 — July 2000

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×