Quantum telescopy clock games

Robert Czupryniak, Eric Chitambar, John Steinmetz, and Andrew N. Jordan
Phys. Rev. A 106, 032424 – Published 21 September 2022

Abstract

We consider the clock game–a task formulated in the framework of quantum information theory—that can be used to improve the existing schemes of quantum-enhanced telescopy. The problem of learning when a stellar photon reaches a telescope is translated into an abstract game, which we call the clock game. A winning strategy is provided that involves performing a quantum non-demolition measurement that verifies which stellar spatio-temporal modes are occupied by a photon without disturbing the phase information. We prove tight lower bounds on the entanglement cost needed to win the clock game, with the amount of necessary entangled bits equaling the number of time bins being distinguished. This lower bound on the entanglement cost applies to any telescopy protocol that aims to nondestructively extract the time bin information of an incident photon through local measurements, and our result implies that the protocol of Khabiboulline et al. [Phys. Rev. Lett. 123, 070504 (2019)] is optimal in terms of entanglement consumption. The full task of the phase extraction is also considered, and we show that the quantum Fisher information of the stellar phase can be achieved by local measurements and shared entanglement without the necessity of nonlinear optical operations. The optimal phase measurement is achieved asymptotically with increasing number of ancilla qubits, whereas a single qubit pair is required if nonlinear operations are allowed.

  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Figure
  • Received 18 March 2022
  • Accepted 17 August 2022

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevA.106.032424

©2022 American Physical Society

Physics Subject Headings (PhySH)

Quantum Information, Science & Technology

Authors & Affiliations

Robert Czupryniak1,2,3,*, Eric Chitambar4, John Steinmetz1,2,3, and Andrew N. Jordan1,2,3

  • 1Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, USA
  • 2Center for Coherence and Quantum Optics, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York 14627, USA
  • 3Institute for Quantum Studies, Chapman University, Orange, California 92866, USA
  • 4Department of Electrical and Computer Engineering, Coordinated Science Laboratory, University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign, Urbana, Illinois 61801, USA

  • *rczupryn@ur.rochester.edu

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 106, Iss. 3 — September 2022

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
CHORUS

Article Available via CHORUS

Download Accepted Manuscript
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review A

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×