Reactions Induced in Ni58 with 0-24 MeV Deuterons: Statistical Model Analysis

Marshall Blann and George Merkel
Phys. Rev. 131, 764 – Published 15 July 1963
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

Excitation functions for Ni58(d, α), (d, αp), (d, αn), (d, 2pn), (d, 2np), and Ni60(d, 2α) reactions have been measured radiochemically for deuteron energies up to 24 MeV. The decrease in the (d, α) excitation curve above the threshold of competing reactions such as (d, αp) and (d, αn) is consistent with the qualitative behavior of compound-nucleus reactions. The experimental results have been compared with statistical-model calculations that assume nuclear level densities of the form ρ(E)(2J+1)E2exp[2(aE)12], where the excitation energy E was corrected for pairing. The value of the parameter a was set equal to the experimental value determined by Brady and Sherr (from alpha-particle energy spectra produced by bombarding Ni58 with 15.6- and 19.4-MeV protons). Cross sections were calculated for all permutations of n, p, d, t, He3, and α emission for two successive evaporations, followed by a calculation of a third evaporation of a neutron, proton, or alpha particle where it was energetically possible. In these calculations the inverse cross sections of particles with energy ε, σinv(ε), were assumed to be of the following forms: for neutrons, σinv(ε)=σ1(1+εnε); for charged particles, σinv(ε)=σ2(1εcε) when ε>εc, and σinv(ε)=0 when ε<εc. The parameters σ1, εn, σ2, and εc were chosen so that values of σinv(ε) would approximate optical-model calculations of the capture cross sections. Two sets of compound-nucleus excitation functions were calculated. In the first set the alpha-particle and the proton inverse cross sections, σinv(ε), were chosen to correspond to optical-model reaction cross sections calculated with parameters deduced from experimental elastic scattering. In the second set of compound-nucleus excitation function calculations the inverse cross sections, σinv(ε), were chosen to correspond to nuclear radii 10% smaller than those used in the first set of calculations. The experimental excitation functions nearly all fall between the two sets of calculated functions.

  • Received 13 March 1963

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRev.131.764

©1963 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Marshall Blann and George Merkel

  • Department of Chemistry, University of Rochester, Rochester, New York

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 131, Iss. 2 — July 1963

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Journals Archive

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×