Abstract
A Comment on the Letter by Christian Schmid et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 230505 (2005). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.
- Received 8 December 2005
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.028901
©2007 American Physical Society
A Comment on the Letter by Christian Schmid et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 230505 (2005). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.98.028901
©2007 American Physical Society