Abstract
A Comment on the Letter by James A. Elliott et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 095501 (2004). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.
- Received 2 April 2004
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.149601
©2004 American Physical Society
A Comment on the Letter by James A. Elliott et al., Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 095501 (2004). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.93.149601
©2004 American Physical Society