Comment on “Negative Refraction Makes a Perfect Lens”

G. W. 't Hooft
Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 249701 – Published 20 November 2001
PDFExport Citation

Abstract

A Comment on the Letter by J. B. Pendry, Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3966 (2000). The authors of the Letter offer a Reply.

Issues similar to those made in the following two Comments were also raised in a paper by N. Garcia and M. Nieto-Vesperinas, Madrid, Spain.

  • Received 24 November 2000

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.87.249701

©2001 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

G. W. 't Hooft

  • Philips Research Laboratories 5656 AA Eindhoven, The Netherlands
  • Huygens Laboratory, University Leiden 2300 RA Leiden, The Netherlands

Comments & Replies

Some Problems with Negative Refraction

John Michael Williams
Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 249703 (2001)

Pendry Replies:

John Pendry
Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 249702 (2001)

Pendry Replies:

John Pendry
Phys. Rev. Lett. 87, 249704 (2001)

Nieto-Vesperinas and Garcia Reply:

M. Nieto-Vesperinas and N. Garcia
Phys. Rev. Lett. 91, 099702 (2003)

Original Article

Negative Refraction Makes a Perfect Lens

J. B. Pendry
Phys. Rev. Lett. 85, 3966 (2000)

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 87, Iss. 24 — 10 December 2001

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Letters

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×