Abstract
A Reply to the Comment by Edward M. Murphy.
- Received 21 January 1999
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1891
©1999 American Physical Society
A Reply to the Comment by Edward M. Murphy.
DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.83.1891
©1999 American Physical Society