Redshift Controversy in Atom Interferometry: Representation Dependence of the Origin of Phase Shift

Wolfgang P. Schleich, Daniel M. Greenberger, and Ernst M. Rasel
Phys. Rev. Lett. 110, 010401 – Published 2 January 2013

Abstract

Motivated by the recent debate on whether the Kasevich-Chu atom interferometer can measure the gravitational redshift, we show that in different representations of quantum mechanics chosen for the calculation, the observed phase shift appears as though it originates from different physical phenomena. In particular, we demonstrate that the decomposition of the total phase shift into three dynamical phases, which emerges in a semiclassical approach and is at the very heart of the redshift controversy, does not appear in an exact treatment based on a representation-free analysis. Here only two phenomena determine the phase shift: the difference of the laser phases and the acceleration of the atom. Hence, the Kasevich-Chu interferometer is an accelerometer or gravimeter.

  • Received 23 July 2012

DOI:https://doi.org/10.1103/PhysRevLett.110.010401

© 2013 American Physical Society

Authors & Affiliations

Wolfgang P. Schleich1, Daniel M. Greenberger1,2, and Ernst M. Rasel3

  • 1Institut für Quantenphysik and Center for Integrated Quantum Science and Technology (IQST), Universität Ulm, D-89069 Ulm, Germany
  • 2City College of New York, New York, New York 10031, USA
  • 3Institut für Quantenoptik, Leibniz Universität Hannover, Welfengarten 1, D-30167 Hannover, Germany

Article Text (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand

References (Subscription Required)

Click to Expand
Issue

Vol. 110, Iss. 1 — 4 January 2013

Reuse & Permissions
Access Options
Author publication services for translation and copyediting assistance advertisement

Authorization Required


×
×

Images

×

Sign up to receive regular email alerts from Physical Review Letters

Log In

Cancel
×

Search


Article Lookup

Paste a citation or DOI

Enter a citation
×